DSM categories and dimensions in clinical and research contexts
- PMID: 17623398
- PMCID: PMC6879071
- DOI: 10.1002/mpr.211
DSM categories and dimensions in clinical and research contexts
Abstract
An enhancement to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-V) is currently under consideration, one that would enhance both the reliability and validity of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) diagnoses: the addition of a dimensional adjunct to each of the traditional categorical diagnoses of the DSM. We first review the history and context of this proposal and define the concepts on which this dimensional proposal is based. The advantages of dimensional measures over categorical measures have long been known, but we here illustrate what is known with a theoretical and a practical demonstration of the potential effects of this addition. Possible objections to the proposal are discussed, concluding with some general criteria for implementing this proposal.
Copyright (c) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
References
-
- Borenstein M. Hypothesis testing and effect size estimation in clinical trials. Annal Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology 1997; 78: 5–16. - PubMed
-
- Caplan PJ. They say you're crazy: how the world's most powerful psychiatrists decide who's nomal. Cambridge, MA: Da Capo Press, 1995.
-
- Cohen J. The cost of dichotomization. Appl Psychological Measurement 1983; 7(3): 249–53.
-
- Cohen J. The Earth is round (p < 0.05). Am Psychologist 1995; 49: 997–1003.
-
- Dar R, Serlin RC, Omer H. Misuse of statistical tests in three decades of psychotherapy research. J Consulting Clin Res 1994; 62: 75–82. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
