Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Summer;40(2):327-31.
doi: 10.1901/jaba.2007.102-06.

Antecedent effects of observing peer play

Affiliations

Antecedent effects of observing peer play

Jennifer L Bruzek et al. J Appl Behav Anal. 2007 Summer.

Abstract

The relative reinforcing value of toys was assessed in the absence of, and immediately following, participant observation of a peer manipulating one of the toys. Preference assessments were used to identify preference hierarchies. Reinforcer assessments were conducted with a high-preference item, a low-preference item, and a control. Each participant allocated responding toward the high-preference item during baseline. When reinforcer assessment sessions were preceded by a peer observation period, 3 of the 4 participants shifted allocation to the toy manipulated by the peer. The 4th participant shifted allocation only when the high-preference stimulus was replaced with a medium-preference stimulus. These data suggest that, among preschoolers, response allocation is influenced by observations of peers playing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The percentage of time in zone during the reinforcer assessments is shown for Amy and Adam (left). Responses per minute during the reinforcer assessments are depicted for Larry and Kerry (right). Brackets indicate reinforcer assessments conducted after observation of peer play. Phase descriptors within the brackets indicate the item (HP, LP, or MP) manipulated by the peer.

References

    1. Betancourt F.W, Zeiler M.D. The choices and preferences of nursery school children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 1971;4:299–304. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cammilleri A.P, Hanley G.P. Use of a lag differential reinforcement contingency to increase varied selections of classroom activities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 2005;38:111–115. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Caplan M, Vespo J, Pederson J, Hay D.F. Conflict and its resolution in small groups of one- and two-year-olds. Child Development. 1991;62:1513–1524. - PubMed
    1. Cuvo A.J, Lerch L.J, Leurquin D.A, Gaffaney T.J, Poppen R.L. Response allocation to concurrent fixed-ratio reinforcement schedules with work requirements by adults with mental retardation and typical preschool children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 1998;31:43–63. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fisher W, Piazza C.C, Bowman L.G, Hagopian L.P, Owens J.C, Slevin I. A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 1992;25:491–498. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources