Microleakage of different amalgams bonded with dual cure resin cements
- PMID: 17624174
Microleakage of different amalgams bonded with dual cure resin cements
Abstract
Introduction: To reduce microleakage in high-copper amalgam restorations, bonding of amalgam was introduced.
Aim: This study compared the microleakage of admixed and spherical amalgams when bonded with different bonding intermediates under thermo- and non-thermocycling conditions.
Method and materials: Class II butt-joint cavities were prepared in 200 extracted human molar teeth, and randomly divided into 5 groups. Calibra, Duo Cement Plus, RelyX ARC and Amalgambond Plus were applied to 4 of these groups. The fifth group was left untreated. The groups were further divided and restored with either Dispersalloy or Oralloy Magicap S. Ten specimens of each group were thermocycled between 5 degrees C and 55 degrees C, placed in basic fuchsin for 8 hours, sectioned and evaluated for dye penetration under 40X magnification. The mean microleakage scores were analysed using the chi-squared test at a confidence level of 95%.
Results: Microleakage of the non-bonded amalgams was significantly higher (p < 0.0001) than for the bonded amalgams (thermocycled and non-thermocycled). The microleakage of the different intermediates bonded to Dispersalloy (thermocycled and non-thermocycled) was not significantly different (p > 0.05). The microleakage of the different intermediates was not significant different except for Duo Cement compared to Calibra (p < 0.0001), RelyX (p < 0.0001) and Amalgambond (p = 0.0433) and Amalgambond compared to Calibra (p = 0.0433) and RelyX (p = 0.0433). The microleakage of the bonded amalgams was not significantly increased by thermocycling (p > 0.05). The microleakage of the two amalgams when bonded with the same resin cements (thermocycled and non-thermocycled) was not significantly different except for Duo Cement (thermocycled) (p = 0.0051) and RelyX (non-thermocycled) (p = 0.0356).
Conclusions: Bonding amalgam restorations to tooth structure in butt-joint cavities will reduce microleakage of both admixed and spherical amalgam restorations. Thermal stress does not affect the bond adversely.
Similar articles
-
Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling.Oper Dent. 2000 Jul-Aug;25(4):316-23. Oper Dent. 2000. PMID: 11203837
-
Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.Oper Dent. 2000 Nov-Dec;25(6):512-9. Oper Dent. 2000. PMID: 11203864
-
Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.J Prosthet Dent. 2009 Oct;102(4):235-41. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60161-X. J Prosthet Dent. 2009. PMID: 19782826
-
A Systematic Review of Amalgam Bonded Restorations: In vitro and Clinical Findings.J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018 Aug 1;19(8):1013-1024. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018. PMID: 30150506
-
Bonded amalgams and their use in clinical practice.Dent Update. 2011 May;38(4):222-4, 226-8, 230. doi: 10.12968/denu.2011.38.4.222. Dent Update. 2011. PMID: 21714403 Review.