Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2007 Aug;19(4):325-30.
doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e328216f880.

Transcervical sterilization

Affiliations
Review

Transcervical sterilization

Jason Abbott. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Aug.

Abstract

Purpose of review: To discuss the methods for achieving success with currently available transcervical sterilization procedures for permanent female contraception.

Recent findings: The transcervical approach has long been thought to be the optimal method for permanent female sterilization, with tubal access achieved by blind, direct (hysteroscopic) or indirect (radiological) techniques, and occlusion being achieved by chemical, mechanical, or thermal techniques. Some combination of these access and occlusion methods encompasses all the current procedures and two types predominate. Quinacrine sterilization is a procedure that is widely used in the developing world, while hysteroscopic procedures such as the Essure and Adiana procedures are either currently available or emerging as visually controlled, device-dependent methods for reliable transcervical sterilization that may be performed in an outpatient or office setting with minimal anesthesia and high patient acceptability. Other devices are used but have less supportive data for their continued use.

Summary: Transcervical methods of female sterilization have good tubal access and occlusion rates, high patient acceptability, and can be performed in an outpatient setting. This combination of factors may offer significant advantages to traditional laparoscopic approaches and render them more cost-effective.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Transcervical sterilization.
    Haneke K, Sokal D. Haneke K, et al. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Apr;20(2):182-3; author reply183-4. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e3282fb2ea8. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2008. PMID: 18388820 No abstract available.