Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 May 30:7:e19.
doi: 10.5334/ijic.187.

Challenges for IT-supported shared care: a qualitative analyses of two shared care initiatives for diabetes treatment in Denmark "I'll never use it" (GP5)

Affiliations

Challenges for IT-supported shared care: a qualitative analyses of two shared care initiatives for diabetes treatment in Denmark "I'll never use it" (GP5)

Maren Fich Granlien et al. Int J Integr Care. .

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the circumstances as to why it is so difficult in the primary care sector to implement IT based infrastructures supporting shared care.

Case study: The qualitative analysis includes two separate case studies of IT-supported shared care implemented in two different regions of Denmark throughout 2005. The study comprises 21 interviews and 35 hours of observations. The data were analysed through a coding process that led to the emergence of three main challenges impeding the organisational implementation of IT-supported shared care.

Discussion and conclusion: The two cases faced the same challenges that led to the same problem: The secondary care sector quickly adopted the system while the primary sector was far more sceptical towards using it. In both cases, we observe a discrepancy of needs satisfied, especially with regard to the primary care sector and its general practitioners which hinder bridging the primary sector (general practitioners) and the secondary sector (hospitals and outpatient clinics). Especially the needs associated with the primary sector were not being satisfied. We discovered three main challenges related to bridging the gap between the two sectors: (1) Poor integration with the general practitioners' existing IT systems; (2) low compatibility with general practitioners' work ethic; (3) and discrepancy between the number of diabetes patients and the related need for shared care. We conclude that development of IT-supported shared care must recognise the underlying and significant differences between the primary and secondary care sectors: If IT-supported shared care does not meet the needs of the general practitioners as well as the needs of the secondary care sector the initiative will fail.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Screen dump System -1.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Screen dump System -2.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pritchard P, Hughes J. Shared care: the future imperative? London: Royal Society of Medicine Press, Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust; 1995.
    1. Short D, Frischer M, Bashford J. Barriers to adoption of computerised decision support systems in general practice consultations: a qualitative study of general practitioner's perspectives. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2004 May;73:357–62. - PubMed
    1. Hampson JP, Roberts RI, Morgan DA. Shared care: a review of the literature. Family Practice. 1996 Jun;13(3):264–79. - PubMed
    1. Pringel M. Improving quality: Bridging the care sector divide. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2003 Dec;15(6):457–62. - PubMed
    1. Kvamme OJ, Olesen F, Samuelsson M. Improving the interface between primary and secondary care: a statement from the European Working party on quality in family practice. Quality Health Care. 2001 Mar;10(1):33–9. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources