Impact of comorbidity on colorectal cancer screening in the veterans healthcare system
- PMID: 17627900
- DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.04.010
Impact of comorbidity on colorectal cancer screening in the veterans healthcare system
Abstract
Background & aims: The quality assessment measure of colorectal cancer screening in the veteran's health system reports the proportion of patients aged 52-80 years who were tested. This approach does little to assess for comorbid illnesses, which might limit the utility of screening. Our aim was to determine the relationship between patient comorbidity and screening by fecal occult blood test in a national sample of veterans.
Methods: We examined the Veterans Health Administration's national databases (October 2003-February 2005) for a random sample of primary care patients, aged > or = 50 years. The Charlson score, a validated measure of comorbidity burden, was calculated from diagnosis codes by the Deyo method. The association between Charlson score and colorectal cancer screening was assessed with logistic regression.
Results: The sample of 77,268 was 97% men; mean age was 67 years. Charlson score distribution was 0, 45%; 1, 24%; 2, 14%; 3, 7%; 4, 4%; 5, 2%; 6, 1%; 7, 0.8%; 8, 0.6%; 9, 0.4%; > or = 10, 1%. Overall there was no consistent significant association between Charlson score and use of fecal occult blood testing except in the sickest 1%. There was a strong and incremental relationship between Charlson score and 1-year mortality.
Conclusions: Although there was a strong relationship in the veteran population between the Charlson score and survival, colorectal cancer screening utilization was not impacted by Charlson score. Instead, resources were expended evenly throughout the population, rather than directed toward screening the patients with the most life-years at stake. The quality measure for colorectal cancer screening should be modified to account for patient comorbidity.
Similar articles
-
Measuring the quality of colorectal cancer screening: the importance of follow-up.Dis Colon Rectum. 2006 Jul;49(7):1002-10. doi: 10.1007/s10350-006-0533-2. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006. PMID: 16673056
-
Colorectal cancer screening in young patients with poor health and severe comorbidity.Arch Intern Med. 2006 Nov 13;166(20):2209-14. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.20.2209. Arch Intern Med. 2006. PMID: 17101938
-
The use of screening colonoscopy for patients cared for by the Department of Veterans Affairs.Arch Intern Med. 2006 Nov 13;166(20):2202-8. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.20.2202. Arch Intern Med. 2006. PMID: 17101937
-
Improving colorectal cancer screening and care in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare system.Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2009 Jan;8(1):22-8. doi: 10.3816/CCC.2009.n.004. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2009. PMID: 19203893 Review.
-
Colorectal cancer: national and international perspective on the burden of disease and public health impact.Gastroenterology. 2010 Jun;138(6):2177-90. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.01.056. Gastroenterology. 2010. PMID: 20420954 Review.
Cited by
-
Patient Attitudes Toward Individualized Recommendations to Stop Low-Value Colorectal Cancer Screening.JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Dec 7;1(8):e185461. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5461. JAMA Netw Open. 2018. PMID: 30646275 Free PMC article.
-
Multi-level predictors of being up-to-date with colorectal cancer screening.Cancer Causes Control. 2023 Dec;34(Suppl 1):187-198. doi: 10.1007/s10552-023-01723-w. Epub 2023 Jun 7. Cancer Causes Control. 2023. PMID: 37285065 Free PMC article.
-
Barriers and facilitators associated with colonoscopy completion in individuals with multiple chronic conditions: a qualitative study.Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017 May 24;11:985-994. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S127862. eCollection 2017. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017. PMID: 28579761 Free PMC article.
-
Colon cancer screening in the elderly: when do we stop?Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2010;121:94-103. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2010. PMID: 20697552 Free PMC article.
-
Colon Cancer Screening among Patients Receiving Dialysis in the United States: Are We Choosing Wisely?J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 Aug;28(8):2521-2528. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2016091019. Epub 2017 Mar 23. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017. PMID: 28336719 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical