Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2007 Aug;61(8):665-75.
doi: 10.1136/jech.2006.053611.

Effect of socioeconomic status on the relationship between atmospheric pollution and mortality

Affiliations
Review

Effect of socioeconomic status on the relationship between atmospheric pollution and mortality

Olivier Laurent et al. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007 Aug.

Abstract

Current knowledge about potential interactions between socioeconomic status and the short- and long-term effects of air pollution on mortality was reviewed. A systematic search of the Medline database through April 2006 extracted detailed information about exposure measures, socioeconomic indicators, subjects' characteristics and principal results. Fifteen articles (time series, case-crossover, cohort) examined short-term effects. The variety of socioeconomic indicators studied made formal comparisons difficult. One striking fact emerged: studies using socioeconomic characteristics measured at coarser geographic resolutions (city- or county-wide) found no effect modification, but those using finer geographic resolutions found mixed results, and five of six studies using individually-measured socioeconomic characteristics found that pollution affected disadvantaged subjects more. This finding was echoed by the six studies of long-term effects (cohorts) identified; these had substantial methodological differences, which we discuss extensively. Current evidence does not yet justify a definitive conclusion that socioeconomic characteristics modify the effects of air pollution on mortality. Nevertheless, existing results, most tending to show greater effects among the more deprived, emphasise the importance of continuing to investigate this topic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chaturvedi N, Jarrett J, Shipley M J.et al Socioeconomic gradient in morbidity and mortality in people with diabetes: cohort study findings from the Whitehall Study and the WHO Multinational Study of Vascular Disease in Diabetes. BMJ 1998316(7125)100–105. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Singh G K, Siahpush M. Increasing inequalities in all‐cause and cardiovascular mortality among US adults aged 25–64 years by area socioeconomic status, 1969–1998. Int J Epidemiol 200231(3)600–613. - PubMed
    1. Avendano M, Kunst A E, Huisman M.et al Socioeconomic status and ischaemic heart disease mortality in 10 western European populations during the 1990s. Heart 200692(4)461–467. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Steenland K, Henley J, Thun M. All‐cause and cause‐specific death rates by educational status for two million people in two American Cancer Society cohorts, 1959–1996. Am J Epidemiol 2002156(1)11–21. - PubMed
    1. Singh G K, Miller B A, Hankey B F.et al Changing area socioeconomic patterns in U.S. cancer mortality, 1950–1998: Part I‐‐All cancers among men, J Natl Cancer Inst 200294(12)904–915. - PubMed