Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2007 Aug;61(8):699-703.
doi: 10.1136/jech.2006.052696.

Does the school fruit and vegetable scheme improve children's diet? A non-randomised controlled trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Does the school fruit and vegetable scheme improve children's diet? A non-randomised controlled trial

J K Ransley et al. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: Evaluation of the impact on diet of the school fruit and vegetable scheme (SFVS).

Design: Non-randomised controlled trial.

Setting: Infant and primary schools in the north of England.

Participants: 3,703 children aged four to six years (reception, year 1, and year 2).

Intervention: One portion of fruit or vegetable provided per child on each school day between February and December 2004.

Main outcome measures: Fruit and vegetables consumed and intake of nutrients.

Results: The SFVS was associated with an increase in fruit intake across reception and year 1 pupils of 0.4 portions (95% confidence interval, 0.2 to 0.5) and 0.6 portions (0.4 to 0.9), respectively, at three months, which fell to 0.2 (0.1 to 0.4) and 0.3 (0.1 to 0.6) at seven months. In year 2 it was associated with an increase of 0.5 portions (0.2 to 0.7) of fruit at three months, which fell to baseline values at seven months when these children were no longer eligible for the scheme. Overall, at seven months there were no changes in vegetable consumption, no associations between the SFVS and energy, fat, or salt intake, and small changes in carotene and vitamin C intake.

Conclusions: The SFVS promoted an increase in fruit intake after three months. At seven months the effect remained significant but reduced, and it returned to baseline in year 2 when pupils were no longer part of the scheme. There was a small impact on the intake of some nutrients across the children surveyed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gregory J, Lowe S, Bates C.National diet and nutrition survey: young people aged 4 to 18 years. Volume 1: Report of the diet and nutrition survey, London: Office of National Statistics 2001
    1. Steinmetz K A, Potter J D. Vegetables, fruit, and cancer prevention: a review. J Am Diet Assoc 1996961027–1037. - PubMed
    1. Key T J, Schatzkin A, Willett W C.et al Diet nutrition and the prevention of cancer. Public Health Nutr 20047(1A suppl 1)187–200. - PubMed
    1. Potter J D.Food nutrition and the prevention of cancer: a global perspective. London: World Cancer Research Fund, 1997
    1. Ness A R, Powles J W. Fruit and vegetables, and cardiovascular disease: a review. Int J Epidemiol 199761–13. - PubMed

Publication types