Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Aug 7;46(31):8961-8.
doi: 10.1021/bi7004043. Epub 2007 Jul 13.

Chemokine signaling specificity: essential role for the N-terminal domain of chemokine receptors

Affiliations

Chemokine signaling specificity: essential role for the N-terminal domain of chemokine receptors

Gregory N Prado et al. Biochemistry. .

Erratum in

  • Biochemistry. 2007 Oct 16;46(41):11660

Abstract

Chemokine IL-8 (CXCL8) binds to its cognate receptors CXCR1 and CXCR2 to induce inflammatory responses, wound healing, tumorogenesis, and neuronal survival. Here we identify the N-loop residues in IL-8 (H18 and F21) and the receptor N-termini as the major structural determinants regulating the rate of receptor internalization, which in turn controlled the activation profile of ERK1/2, a central component of the receptor/ERK signaling pathway that dictates signal specificity. Our data further support the idea that the chemokine receptor core acts as a plastic scaffold. Thus, the diversity and intensity of inflammatory and noninflammatory responses mediated by chemokine receptors appear to be primarily determined by the initial interaction between the receptor N-terminus and the N-loop of chemokines.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
ELR chemokines induce internalization of CXCR2. COS-7 cells expressing CXCR2 were treated with saturating concentrations (100 nM) of IL-8 (●), MGSA (▼), or GCP-2 (O) at 37 °C for various amounts of time. After an acid wash, the surface receptors were assessed by [125I]IL-8 binding at 4 °C (25). Sequence alignments of IL-8, MGSA, and GCP-2 are shown with their corresponding secondary structure domains; the thick red line identifies the conserved ELR triad, and the thick blue line identifies the divergent N-loop sequences.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
N-Loop IL-8 mutants fail to trigger internalization of CXCR1 and CXCR2. COS-7 cells expressing CXCR1 (a) or CXCR2 (b) were treated with saturating concentrations (100 nM) of IL-8 (●), H18A (○), F21A (▼), or H18A/F21A (▽) at 37 °C for different amounts of time. After an acid wash, the surface IL-8 receptors were assessed by [125I]IL-8 binding (25).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
IL-8 and the ELR mutant (R6A) induce internalization of CXCR2. COS-7 cells expressing CXCR2 were treated with 100 nM IL-8 or 1 µM R6A for different amounts of time. After an acid wash, the cell surface receptors were assessed by [125I]IL-8 binding (25).
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Receptor N-termini determine the rate of receptor internalization. COS-7 cells expressing CXCR1 (●), CXCR2 (○), N1R2 (▼), and N2R1 (△) were treated with 100 nM IL-8 for various amounts of time. After an acid wash, the cell surface receptors were assessed by [125I]IL-8 binding (25).
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Receptor N-termini determine the activation profile of ERK1/2. COS-7 cells transfected with CXCR1, CXCR2, N1R2, or N2R1 were treated with 100 nM IL-8 for different amounts of time. The phosphorylated ERK1/2 was analyzed by Western blot analysis (a). The levels of phospho-ERK1/2 relative to the total ERK were plotted (b). Data are representative of three independent experiments.
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
Hypothetical model of binding of IL-8 to its cognate receptor. The putative interacting surfaces of the receptor and IL-8 (sites 1 and 2) are encircled. Site 1 represents the interaction of the N-terminus of the receptor with the N-loop of IL-8, whereas site 2 represents the interaction of the extracellular loops of the receptor with the ELR triad of IL-8.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Baggiolini M. Chemokines and leukocyte traffic. Nature. 1998;392:565–568. - PubMed
    1. Onuffer JJ, Horuk R. Chemokines, chemokine receptors and small-molecule antagonists: Recent developments. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2002;23:459–467. - PubMed
    1. Thelen M. Dancing to the tune of chemokines. Nat. Immunol. 2001;2:129–134. - PubMed
    1. Ben-Baruch A, Bengali K, Tani K, Xu L, Oppenheim JJ, Wang JM. IL-8 and NAP-2 differ in their capacities to bind and chemoattract 293 cells transfected with either IL-8 receptor type A or type B. Cytokine. 1997;9:37–45. - PubMed
    1. Ben-Baruch A, Grimm M, Bengali K, Evans GA, Chertov O, Wang JM, Howard OM, Mukaida N, Matsushima K, Oppenheim JJ. The differential ability of IL-8 and neutrophil-activating peptide-2 to induce attenuation of chemotaxis is mediated by their divergent capabilities to phosphorylate CXCR2 (IL-8 receptor B) J. Immunol. 1997;158:5927–5933. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms