Distal urethral reconstruction of the glans for penile carcinoma: results of a novel technique at 1-year of followup
- PMID: 17632177
- DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.059
Distal urethral reconstruction of the glans for penile carcinoma: results of a novel technique at 1-year of followup
Abstract
Purpose: No satisfactory techniques are available to replace the anatomy and function of the penile glans after radical surgery for penile carcinoma. We report a new technique of glans reconstruction using distal urethra. We evaluated anatomical, physiological and esthetic features as well as short-term and long-term clinical outcomes.
Materials and methods: A total of 14 patients with a mean age of 54 who had squamous penile carcinoma underwent glans reconstruction after simple glansectomy in 8 and after amputation of the distal third of the shaft in 6. Glans sensibility, erectile function, ejaculation, orgasm, penile length, local recurrence, patient and partner satisfaction, and quality of life were evaluated before and after the operation. Mean followup was 13 months.
Results: All patients noticed subjective and objective thermal and tactile epicritic sensibility in the area of the neoglans. Ten of 14 patients (71%) noticed spontaneous and/or induced rigid erections. Interestingly International Index of Erectile Function scores in the ejaculation and orgasm domains did not significantly change in the period before and after surgery. No local disease recurrence or penile retraction were reported at long-term followup.
Conclusions: Reconstructive glanuloplasty with distal urethra in penile tumor surgery is an innovative, easy and rapid surgical technique with appreciable functional and esthetic results.
Similar articles
-
Glansectomy with split-thickness skin graft for the treatment of penile carcinoma.Int J Impot Res. 2009 Sep-Oct;21(5):311-4. doi: 10.1038/ijir.2009.17. Epub 2009 May 21. Int J Impot Res. 2009. PMID: 19458620
-
Multi-institutional long-term experience with conservative surgery for invasive penile carcinoma.J Urol. 2003 Feb;169(2):500-2. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000043808.58188.52. J Urol. 2003. PMID: 12544296
-
Long-term outcome of excisional organ sparing surgery for carcinoma of the penis.J Urol. 2011 Oct;186(4):1303-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.05.084. J Urol. 2011. PMID: 21862071
-
[Penile verrucous carcinoma].Arch Esp Urol. 1999 Nov;52(9):937-40. Arch Esp Urol. 1999. PMID: 10633961 Review. Spanish.
-
Reconstructive surgery of the penis.Curr Opin Urol. 2006 Nov;16(6):396-400. doi: 10.1097/01.mou.0000250278.44990.4f. Curr Opin Urol. 2006. PMID: 17053518 Review.
Cited by
-
Sexual function after surgical treatment for penile cancer: Which organ-sparing approach gives the best results?Can Urol Assoc J. 2015 Jul-Aug;9(7-8):E423-7. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.2801. Can Urol Assoc J. 2015. PMID: 26279710 Free PMC article.
-
Organ-preserving surgery for penile carcinoma.Adv Urol. 2008;2008:634216. doi: 10.1155/2008/634216. Epub 2008 Nov 4. Adv Urol. 2008. PMID: 19009032 Free PMC article.
-
Penile preserving and reconstructive surgery in the management of penile cancer.Nat Rev Urol. 2016 May;13(5):249-57. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2016.54. Epub 2016 Mar 22. Nat Rev Urol. 2016. PMID: 27001013 Review.
-
[Psychosocial effects in patients with penile cancer : A systematic review].Urologe A. 2018 Apr;57(4):444-452. doi: 10.1007/s00120-018-0603-9. Urologe A. 2018. PMID: 29476193 German.
-
Clinicopathologic Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes of Penile Cancer.World J Mens Health. 2017 Apr;35(1):28-33. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.2017.35.1.28. World J Mens Health. 2017. PMID: 28459145 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
