Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007;9(3):188-94.
doi: 10.4088/pcc.v09n0304.

Modafinil for excessive sleepiness associated with chronic shift work sleep disorder: effects on patient functioning and health-related quality of life

Affiliations

Modafinil for excessive sleepiness associated with chronic shift work sleep disorder: effects on patient functioning and health-related quality of life

Milton K Erman et al. Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2007.

Abstract

Objective: We evaluated the effects of modafinil, a wake-promoting agent, on patient functioning, health-related quality of life, and nighttime and daytime sleep in patients with excessive sleepiness associated with shift work sleep disorder (SWSD).

Method: A 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was performed at 31 centers in the United States between February 2001 and March 2002. Adults (N = 278) with excessive sleepiness associated with chronic SWSD (International Classification of Sleep Disorders criteria) were randomly assigned to receive modafinil 200 or 300 mg or placebo, 30 to 60 minutes before each night shift. Effects on patient functioning and quality of life were assessed using the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ) and the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), respectively. Daily patient diaries were used as a sleep log.

Results: Modafinil 300 mg significantly improved mean FOSQ total score relative to placebo (2.3-point increase from baseline vs. 1.6 for placebo; p < .05). Both doses of modafinil significantly improved mean SF-36 mental component scores relative to placebo (mean changes from baseline of 3.2, 3.7, and 0.7 points in the modafinil 300-mg, modafinil 200-mg, and placebo groups, respectively; p < .05 for each comparison vs. placebo). Modafinil did not adversely affect sleep when sleep was desired or caffeine use. Modafinil was well tolerated. Headache (21.5%) and nausea (12.4%) were the most common adverse events in modafinil-treated patients. Differences between modafinil and placebo for vital sign measurements, physical examination findings, or electrocardiography results were not clinically meaningful.

Conclusions: Modafinil significantly improves functioning and quality of life in patients with SWSD. Modafinil is an effective treatment for excessive sleepiness associated with SWSD.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Patient Disposition in a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Modafinil for Excessive Sleepiness Associated With Chronic Shift Work Sleep Disorder
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Mean (SEM) Change From Baseline to Final Visit in Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ) Domain Scores by Treatment Group
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Mean (SEM) Change From Baseline to Final Visit in (A) 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical and Mental Component Summary Scores and (B) SF-36 Domain Scores by Treatment Group

References

    1. American Academy of Sleep Medicine. International Classification of Sleep Disorders, 2nd edition: Diagnostic and Coding Manual. Westchester, Ill: American Academy of Sleep Medicine; 2005
    1. Rajaratnam SM, Arendt J.. Health in a 24-h society. Lancet. 2001;358:999–1005. - PubMed
    1. Reimer MA, Flemons WW.. Quality of life in sleep disorders. Sleep Med Rev. 2003;7:335–349. - PubMed
    1. Sforza E, Janssens JP, and Rochat T. et al. Determinants of altered quality of life in patients with sleep-related breathing disorders. Eur Respir J. 2003 21:682–687. - PubMed
    1. Beers T.. Flexible schedules and shift work: replacing the ‘9-to-5’ workday? Monthly Labor Rev. 2000;123:33–40.