Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Sep;31(9):1731-1736.
doi: 10.1007/s00268-007-9176-2.

Breast-conserving therapy for palpable and nonpalpable breast cancer: can surgical residents do the job irrespective of experience?

Berry Cleffken  1   2 , Job Postelmans  3 , Steven Olde Damink  4 , Marius Nap  5 , Ineke Schreutelkamp  6 , Hans van der Bijl  3
Affiliations

Breast-conserving therapy for palpable and nonpalpable breast cancer: can surgical residents do the job irrespective of experience?

Berry Cleffken et al. World J Surg. 2007 Sep.

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of operative experience in obtaining tumor-free margins in breast-conserving therapy. In the case of palpable breast cancers, lumpectomies can safely be performed by any surgical resident. For nonpalpable breast cancers, lumpectomies should be treated only by senior residents or attending surgeons, even if supervision during the operation is given by an attending surgeon for junior residents. Radicality of breast carcinoma excision, defined by the tumor-free margin of the removed specimen has been determined to be the major prognostic factor for local recurrence. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of operative experience in obtaining tumor-free margins in breast-conserving therapy (BCT). Can lumpectomy for breast carcinoma be performed by surgical residents safely?

Methods: All lumpectomies for breast carcinoma between 1999 and 2003 were included out of a prospective database of a single institution. Radicality of resection and patient and histopathologic tumor characteristics were analyzed for 660 lumpectomies. Operative experience of the surgeon performing the lumpectomy was staged as junior residents (JR, years 1-3 in residency), senior residents (SR; years 4-6 in residency), and attending surgeon (AS).

Results: A significant difference in obtaining tumor-free margins for palpable tumors was found between ASs (81%) vs. SRs assisted by another resident (92%). For nonpalpable tumors, a significant difference was found in two groups: (1) SRs assisted by another surgical resident (86%) vs. JRs assisted by another surgical resident (61%) and (2) ASs (83%) vs. JRs assisted by another resident (61%) or assisted by an AS (73%).

Conclusion: Surgical residents can safely perform BCT in patients with palpable breast cancer. The level of experience has no statistical significance for palpable tumors in a high-volume center. Nonpalpable lesions should be treated only by SRs or ASs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1002/cncr.20022', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.20022'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '14770422', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14770422/'}]}
    2. Kroman N, Holtveg H, Wohlfahrt J, et al. (2004) Effect of breast-conserving therapy versus radical mastectomy on prognosis for young women with breast carcinoma. Cancer 100(4):688–693 - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1056/NEJMoa020989', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa020989'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '12393819', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12393819/'}]}
    2. Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, et al. (2002) Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347(16):1227–1232 - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1016/S0002-9610(02)01012-7', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9610(02)01012-7'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '12433599', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12433599/'}]}
    2. Singletary SE (2002) Surgical margins in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy. Am J Surg 184(5):383–393 - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '11180766', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11180766/'}]}
    2. Horiguchi J, Iino Y, Takei H, et al. (2001) Recurrence of breast cancer following local excision alone for ductal carcinoma in situ. Breast Cancer 8(1):52–57 - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '9619174', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9619174/'}]}
    2. Cox CE, Pendas S, Ku NN, et al. (1998) Local recurrence of breast cancer after cytological evaluation of lumpectomy margins. Am Surg 64(6):533–537; discussion 537–538 - PubMed