Range of motion change after cervical arthroplasty with ProDisc-C and prestige artificial discs compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
- PMID: 17633486
- DOI: 10.3171/SPI-07/07/040
Range of motion change after cervical arthroplasty with ProDisc-C and prestige artificial discs compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
Abstract
Object: Range of motion (ROM) changes were evaluated at the surgically treated and adjacent segments in cadaveric specimens treated with two different cervical artificial discs compared with those measured in intact spine and fusion models.
Methods: Eighteen cadaveric human cervical spines were tested in the intact state for the different modes of motion (extension, flexion, lateral bending, and axial rotation) up to 2 Nm. Three groups of specimens (fitted with either the ProDisc-C or Prestige II cervical artificial disc or submitted to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion [ACDF]) were tested after implantation at C6-7 level. The ROM values were measured at treated and adjacent segments, and these values were then compared with those measured in the intact spine.
Results: At the surgically treated segment, the ROM increased after arthroplasty compared with the intact spine in extension (54% in the ProDisc-C group, 47% in the Prestige group) and in flexion (27% in the ProDisc-C group, 10% in the Prestige group). In bending and rotation, the postarthroplasty ROMs were greater than those of the intact spine (10% in the ProDisc-C group and 55% in the Prestige group in bending, 17% in the ProDisc-C group and 50% in the Prestige group in rotation). At the adjacent levels the ROMs decreased in all specimens treated with either artificial disc in all modes of motion (< 10%) except for extension at the inferior the level (29% decrease for ProDisc-C implant, 12% decrease for Prestige disc). The ROM for all motion modes in the ACDF-treated spine decreased at the treated level (range 18-44%) but increased at the adjacent levels (range 3-20%).
Conclusions: Both ProDisc-C and Prestige artificial discs were associated with increased ROM at the surgically treated segment compared with the intact spine with or without significance for all modes of testing. In addition, adjacent-level ROM decreased in all modes of motion except extension in specimens fitted with both artificial discs.
Similar articles
-
Changes in adjacent-level disc pressure and facet joint force after cervical arthroplasty compared with cervical discectomy and fusion.J Neurosurg Spine. 2007 Jul;7(1):33-9. doi: 10.3171/SPI-07/07/033. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007. PMID: 17633485
-
Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.Spine J. 2010 Apr;10(4):341-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.01.006. Spine J. 2010. PMID: 20362252
-
Analysis of in vivo kinematics of 3 different cervical devices: Bryan disc, ProDisc-C, and Prestige LP disc.J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 Dec;15(6):630-5. doi: 10.3171/2011.8.SPINE11273. Epub 2011 Sep 9. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011. PMID: 21905776
-
A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis of the Adjacent Segment Parameters in Cervical Disk Arthroplasty Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.Clin Spine Surg. 2018 May;31(4):162-173. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000552. Clin Spine Surg. 2018. PMID: 28622185
-
Cervical arthroplasty: what does the labeling say?Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Feb;42(2):E2. doi: 10.3171/2016.11.FOCUS16414. Neurosurg Focus. 2017. PMID: 28142245 Review.
Cited by
-
Unique biomechanical signatures of Bryan, Prodisc C, and Prestige LP cervical disc replacements: a finite element modelling study.Eur Spine J. 2020 Nov;29(11):2631-2639. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06113-y. Epub 2019 Oct 12. Eur Spine J. 2020. PMID: 31606816
-
Early outcome of posterior cervical endoscopic discectomy: an alternative treatment choice for physically/socially active patients.J Korean Med Sci. 2009 Apr;24(2):302-6. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2009.24.2.302. Epub 2009 Apr 20. J Korean Med Sci. 2009. PMID: 19399274 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of M6-C and Mobi-C cervical total disc replacement for cervical degenerative disc disease in adults.J Spine Surg. 2019 Dec;5(4):393-403. doi: 10.21037/jss.2019.09.27. J Spine Surg. 2019. PMID: 32042989 Free PMC article.
-
ProDisc-C versus fusion with Cervios chronOS prosthesis in cervical degenerative disc disease: Is there a difference at 12 months?Evid Based Spine Care J. 2010 May;1(1):51-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1100894. Evid Based Spine Care J. 2010. PMID: 23544025 Free PMC article.
-
Mid- to long-term outcome of instrumented anterior cervical fusion for subaxial injuries.Eur Spine J. 2009 May;18(5):630-53. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0879-3. Epub 2009 Feb 6. Eur Spine J. 2009. PMID: 19198895 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical