Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1991 Dec;167(12):701-7.

A prospective randomized study concerning to the point A dose in high-dose rate intracavitary radiation therapy for carcinoma of the uterine cervix

Affiliations
  • PMID: 1763406
Clinical Trial

A prospective randomized study concerning to the point A dose in high-dose rate intracavitary radiation therapy for carcinoma of the uterine cervix

M Chatani et al. Strahlenther Onkol. 1991 Dec.

Abstract

From January 1983 through December 1987, a total of 138 patients with previously untreated carcinoma of the uterine cervix were entered into the prospective randomized study concerning the two different schedules of point A dose of remote afterloading high-dose rate intracavitary therapy (RALS) and external irradiation dose at the Center for Adult Diseases, Osaka. Group A consisted of 71 patients who were treated with fraction size of point A dose of 7.5 Gy and group B included 67 patients treated with fraction size of 6 Gy. According to the staging system of UICC (1978), 33 patients were classified into stage I, 50 patients stage II, 45 patients stage III, and ten patients stage IV. Three-year survival rates by stage and RALS schedule were in group A 80% and in group B 100% in stage I, 57% and 68% in stage II, 62% and 60% in stage III and 2/8 and 0/2 in stage IV. Survival curves showed no statistically significant difference in each stage. Late rectal and bladder complications requiring treatment (Kottmeier's grade 2 or more) after RALS developed 1.5% (2/138, group A none, group B two) and 1.5% (2/138, group A one, group B one), respectively. This result suggests that this trial is acceptable on survival as well as complication rates.

PubMed Disclaimer