Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Jun;136(6):813-22.
doi: 10.1017/S0950268807009181. Epub 2007 Jul 18.

Social contacts of school children and the transmission of respiratory-spread pathogens

Affiliations

Social contacts of school children and the transmission of respiratory-spread pathogens

R T Mikolajczyk et al. Epidemiol Infect. 2008 Jun.

Abstract

Empirical data about contact frequencies of children is needed for estimating parameters in mathematical modelling studies that investigate the effect of targeting influenza intervention to children. A survey about the social contacts of school children was conducted in a primary school in Germany. The distribution of the daily numbers of contacts was stratified by age of the contacted person and by weekday. A negative binomial regression analysis was performed to investigate factors that influence contact behaviour. Using logistic regression analysis we examined the relationship between the numbers of private contacts and having been ill in the last 6 months. We computed effective contact numbers to take the heterogeneity in contact behaviour into account in assessing the contribution of children's contacts to the overall transmission of an infection. The possible effects of intervention measures such as school closure and vaccination on the transmission of respiratory-spread agents to other age groups are discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The numbers of all reported contacts by day of the week.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The distributions of the numbers of (a) private contacts and (b) contacts at school.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The number of private contacts is plotted against the number of school contacts for each respondent. For small contact numbers there is a weak positive correlation, while overall the number of private contacts appears to be uncorrelated with the number of school contacts.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Distribution of the number of private contacts across age groups. The ages of contacted persons are given in the following categories: age group 1 (preschool children), age group 2 (peers), age group 3 (adolescents), age group 4 (younger adults – parents' age), age group 5 (older adults – grandparents' age).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Halloran ME et al. Community interventions and the epidemic prevention potential. Vaccine. 2002;20:3254–3262. - PubMed
    1. Longini IM, Jr. et al. Containing pandemic influenza with antiviral agents. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2004;159:623–633. - PubMed
    1. Doyle A et al. Influenza pandemic preparedness in France: modelling the impact of interventions. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2006;60:399–404. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ferguson NM et al. Strategies for mitigating an influenza pandemic. Nature. 2006;442:448–452. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Germann TC et al. Mitigation strategies for pandemic influenza in the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 2006;103:5935–5940. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types