WITHDRAWN: Very tight versus tight control for diabetes in pregnancy
- PMID: 17636623
- PMCID: PMC10775759
- DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000226.pub2
WITHDRAWN: Very tight versus tight control for diabetes in pregnancy
Abstract
Background: Pregnancies complicated by pre-existing insulin dependent diabetes are high risk for a number of poor pregnancy and neonatal outcomes.
Objectives: The objective of this review was to assess the effects of very tight glycaemic control in established insulin dependence.
Search strategy: The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register was searched.
Selection criteria: Randomised trials comparing very tight with tight control of diabetes in pregnancy.
Data collection and analysis: One reviewer assessed trial quality and extracted data.
Main results: Two trials involving 182 women were involved. The two trials were difficult to compare. Maternal hypoglycaemia was more common among women whose diabetic control was very tight compared to tight control (odds ratio 25.96, 95% confidence interval 4.91 to 137.26) based on one trial. There was no difference detected in perinatal outcome between the groups.
Authors' conclusions: There appears to be no clear evidence of benefit from very tight glycaemic control for pregnant diabetic women. Since very strict control may have a substantial impact on lifestyle, this suggests caution in advising such a degree of control.
Update of
-
Very tight versus tight control for diabetes in pregnancy.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD000226. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000226. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;(2):CD000226. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000226.pub2. PMID: 10796184 Updated.
Similar articles
-
Very tight versus tight control for diabetes in pregnancy.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD000226. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000226. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;(2):CD000226. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000226.pub2. PMID: 10796184 Updated.
-
Relaxation techniques for pain management in labour.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 28;3(3):CD009514. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009514.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 29589650 Free PMC article.
-
Planned birth at or near term for improving health outcomes for pregnant women with gestational diabetes and their infants.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 5;1(1):CD012910. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012910. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 29303230 Free PMC article.
-
Immersion in water during labour and birth.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 16;5(5):CD000111. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000111.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 29768662 Free PMC article.
-
Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 21;5(5):CD000331. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000331.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 29781504 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Treatments for women with gestational diabetes mellitus: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 14;8(8):CD012327. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012327.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 30103263 Free PMC article.
-
Vitamin E Supplement Protects Against Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Mice Through nuclear factor-erythroid factor 2-related factor 2/heme oxygenase-1 Signaling Pathway.Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2023 Mar 1;16:565-574. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S397255. eCollection 2023. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2023. PMID: 36883138 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical