Continuous support for women during childbirth
- PMID: 17636733
- DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub2
Continuous support for women during childbirth
Update in
-
Continuous support for women during childbirth.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Feb 16;(2):CD003766. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10:CD003766. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub4. PMID: 21328263 Updated.
Abstract
Background: Historically, women have been attended and supported by other women during labour. However, in recent decades in hospitals worldwide, continuous support during labour has become the exception rather than the routine. Concerns about the consequent dehumanization of women's birth experiences have led to calls for a return to continuous support by women for women during labour.
Objectives: Primary: to assess the effects, on mothers and their babies, of continuous, one-to-one intrapartum support compared with usual care. Secondary: to determine whether the effects of continuous support are influenced by: (1) routine practices and policies in the birth environment that may affect a woman's autonomy, freedom of movement and ability to cope with labour; (2) whether the caregiver is a member of the staff of the institution; and (3) whether the continuous support begins early or later in labour.
Search strategy: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (February 2007).
Selection criteria: All published and unpublished randomized controlled trials comparing continuous support during labour with usual care.
Data collection and analysis: We used standard methods of the Cochrane Collaboration Pregnancy and Childbirth Group. All authors participated in evaluation of methodological quality. One author and a research assistant independently extracted the data. We sought additional information from the trial authors. We used relative risk for categorical data and weighted mean difference for continuous data to present the results.
Main results: Sixteen trials involving 13,391 women met inclusion criteria and provided usable outcome data. Primary comparison: women who had continuous intrapartum support were likely to have a slightly shorter labour, were more likely to have a spontaneous vaginal birth and less likely to have intrapartum analgesia or to report dissatisfaction with their childbirth experiences. Subgroup analyses: in general, continuous intrapartum support was associated with greater benefits when the provider was not a member of the hospital staff, when it began early in labour and in settings in which epidural analgesia was not routinely available.
Authors' conclusions: All women should have support throughout labour and birth.
Update of
-
Continuous support for women during childbirth.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(3):CD003766. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003766. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;(3):CD003766. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub2. PMID: 12917986 Updated.
Similar articles
-
Continuous support for women during childbirth.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(3):CD003766. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003766. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;(3):CD003766. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub2. PMID: 12917986 Updated.
-
Continuous support for women during childbirth.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10:CD003766. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 15;7:CD003766. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub5. PMID: 23076901 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
Continuous support for women during childbirth.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Feb 16;(2):CD003766. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10:CD003766. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub4. PMID: 21328263 Updated.
-
Continuous support for women during childbirth.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 15;7:CD003766. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 06;7:CD003766. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub6. PMID: 23857334 Updated.
-
Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 21;5(5):CD000331. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000331.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 29781504 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Reduced breastfeeding rates among obese mothers: a review of contributing factors, clinical considerations and future directions.Int Breastfeed J. 2015 Jul 1;10:21. doi: 10.1186/s13006-015-0046-5. eCollection 2015. Int Breastfeed J. 2015. PMID: 26140049 Free PMC article.
-
Doulas as community health workers: lessons learned from a volunteer program.J Perinat Educ. 2006 Summer;15(3):25-33. doi: 10.1624/105812406X118995. J Perinat Educ. 2006. PMID: 17541457 Free PMC article.
-
Listening to their voices: understanding rural women's perceptions of good delivery care at the Mibilizi District Hospital in Rwanda.BMC Womens Health. 2018 Feb 12;18(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12905-018-0530-3. BMC Womens Health. 2018. PMID: 29433492 Free PMC article.
-
Analgesia in Obstetrics.Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2012 Jul;72(7):596-601. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1298444. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2012. PMID: 25264376 Free PMC article.
-
A Prospective Investigation of Prenatal Mood and Childbirth Perceptions in an Ethnically Diverse, Low-Income Sample.Birth. 2016 Jun;43(2):159-66. doi: 10.1111/birt.12221. Epub 2016 Mar 7. Birth. 2016. PMID: 26948850 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous