Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: four versus eight strands of hamstring tendon graft
- PMID: 17637413
- DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.01.022
Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: four versus eight strands of hamstring tendon graft
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical results of a double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with 4 strands versus 8 strands of hamstring tendon graft.
Methods: Seventy-six patients with chronic ACL rupture were randomly separated into two groups for double-bundle ACL reconstruction. In the 4-strand hamstring graft (4SHG) group, the semitendinosus tendon was used to make two 2-stranded hamstring tendon grafts, whereas in the 8-strand hamstring graft (8SHG) group, the semitendinosus tendon was used to make one 4SHG and the gracilis tendon was used to make the other 4SHG. The 4SHG group comprised 33 patients and the 8SHG group comprised 35 patients, with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm scales were used to evaluate the clinical results.
Results: In the 4SHG group the side-to-side difference was less than 3 mm in 26 patients (78.8%), 3 to 5 mm in 4 patients (12.1%), and 6 to 10 mm in 3 patients (9.0%), with a mean value of 2.8 +/- 0.5 mm; the pivot-shift test was negative in 29 patients (89.9%) and positive in 4 (12.1%). In the 8SHG group the side-to-side difference was less than 3 mm in 32 patients (91.4%), 3 to 5 mm in 2 patients (5.7%), and 6 mm in 1 patient (2.9%) (P = .004), with a mean value of 1.3 +/- 0.4 mm (P = .0003); the pivot-shift test was negative in 34 patients (97.1%) and positive in 1 (2.9%). According to the IKDC scale, 29 patients (87.9%) in the 4SHG group and 33 patients (94.3%) in the 8SHG group had a grade of normal or nearly normal. In the 4SHG and 8SHG groups the mean IKDC subjective knee evaluation results were 86.4 +/- 4.2 and 96.3 +/- 2.8 (P = .0007), respectively, and the mean Lysholm scores were 89.6 +/- 3.7 and 96.5 +/- 2.9 (P = .0006), respectively.
Conclusions: On the basis of KT-1000 examination (MEDmetric, San Diego, CA) and clinical measures, double-bundle ACL reconstruction with 8SHG yields significantly better results than double-bundle ACL reconstruction with 4SHG, with a mean side-to-side difference in anterior knee laxity of 1.3 +/- 0.4 mm versus 2.8 +/- 0.5 mm (P = .0003), IKDC subjective result of 96.3 +/- 2.8 versus 86.4 +/- 4.2 (P = .0007), and Lysholm score of 96.5 +/- 2.9 versus 89.6 +/- 3.7 (P = .0006).
Level of evidence: Level II, lesser-quality randomized controlled trial.
Comment in
-
Concerns about double-bundle reconstruction with 8-strand hamstring tendon graft.Arthroscopy. 2008 Aug;24(8):969; author reply 970. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.05.017. Arthroscopy. 2008. PMID: 18657749 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Primary versus single-stage revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autologous hamstring tendon grafts: a prospective matched-group analysis.Am J Sports Med. 2007 Oct;35(10):1643-52. doi: 10.1177/0363546507303114. Epub 2007 Jun 15. Am J Sports Med. 2007. PMID: 17575015 Clinical Trial.
-
Four-strand hamstring tendon autograft versus LARS artificial ligament for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Int Orthop. 2010 Feb;34(1):45-9. doi: 10.1007/s00264-009-0768-3. Epub 2009 Apr 25. Int Orthop. 2010. PMID: 19396441 Free PMC article.
-
Irradiated Hamstring Tendon Allograft Versus Autograft for Anatomic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Midterm Clinical Outcomes.Am J Sports Med. 2016 Oct;44(10):2579-2588. doi: 10.1177/0363546516655333. Epub 2016 Jul 27. Am J Sports Med. 2016. PMID: 27466222 Clinical Trial.
-
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a four-strand hamstring tendon autograft. Surgical technique.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Mar;87 Suppl 1(Pt 1):51-66. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02805. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005. PMID: 15743847 Review.
-
Comparison of clinical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft versus soft-tissue allograft: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.Int J Surg. 2018 Aug;56:174-183. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.06.030. Epub 2018 Jun 21. Int J Surg. 2018. PMID: 29936196 Review.
Cited by
-
Meniscal resection increases the risk of residual knee laxity even in patients undergoing anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with eight strands of hamstring autografts.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Jul;31(7):2784-2793. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-07231-9. Epub 2022 Nov 15. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023. PMID: 36378292
-
Hamstring graft sizes differ between Chinese and Caucasians.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012 May;20(5):916-21. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1653-3. Epub 2011 Aug 25. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012. PMID: 21866349
-
A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Standard Techniques Are Comparable (299 Trials With 25,816 Patients).Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021 May 14;3(4):e1211-e1226. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.03.017. eCollection 2021 Aug. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021. PMID: 34430902 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Synovial C-Shaped Tibial Footprint of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament.Orthop J Sports Med. 2016 Nov 8;4(11):2325967116671300. doi: 10.1177/2325967116671300. eCollection 2016 Nov. Orthop J Sports Med. 2016. PMID: 27868076 Free PMC article.
-
Double-bundle PCL reconstruction using tibial double cross-pin fixation.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010 Jan;18(1):117-22. doi: 10.1007/s00167-009-0812-2. Epub 2009 Apr 28. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010. PMID: 19399475
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials