Influence of callosal transfer on visual cortical evoked response and the implication in the development of a visual prosthesis
- PMID: 17638003
- DOI: 10.1007/s00417-007-0648-8
Influence of callosal transfer on visual cortical evoked response and the implication in the development of a visual prosthesis
Abstract
Background: The development of a visual prosthesis has been limited by an incomplete understanding of functional changes of the visual cortex accompanying deafferentation. In particular, the role of the corpus callosum in modulating these changes has not been fully evaluated. Recent experimental evidence suggests that through synaptic modulation, short-term (4-5 days) visual deafferentation can induce plastic changes in the visual cortex, leading to adaptive enhancement of residual visual input. We therefore investigated whether a compensatory rerouting of visual information can occur via the indirect transcallosal linkage after deafferentation and the influence of this interhemispheric communication on the visual evoked response of each hemisphere.
Methods: In albino rabbits, misrouting of uncrossed optic fibres reduces ipsilateral input to a negligible degree. We thus took advantage of this congenital anomaly to model unilateral cortical and ocular deafferentation by eliminating visual input from one eye and recorded the visual evoked potential (VEP) from the intact eye.
Results: In keeping with the chiasmal anomaly, no VEP was elicited from the hemisphere ipsilateral to the intact eye. This remained unchanged following unilateral visual deafferentation. The amplitude and latency of the VEP in the fellow hemisphere, however, were significantly decreased in the deafferented animals.
Conclusion: Our data suggest that callosal linkage does not contribute to visual evoked responses and this is not changed after short-term deafferentation. The decrease in amplitude and latency of evoked responses in the hemisphere ipsilateral to the treated eye, however, confirms the facilitatory role of callosal transfer. This observation highlights the importance of bicortical stimulation in the future design of a cortical visual prosthesis.
Similar articles
-
The deafferented visual cortex: neuronal activity and visual evoked potentials.Int J Neurosci. 1987 Mar;33(1-2):85-91. doi: 10.3109/00207458708985931. Int J Neurosci. 1987. PMID: 3610495
-
Callosal contribution to ocular dominance in rat primary visual cortex.Eur J Neurosci. 2010 Oct;32(7):1163-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07363.x. Epub 2010 Aug 19. Eur J Neurosci. 2010. PMID: 20726891
-
Time-frequency analysis of visual evoked potentials for interhemispheric transfer time and proportion in callosal fibers of different diameters.Biol Cybern. 2004 Apr;90(4):291-301. doi: 10.1007/s00422-004-0469-3. Epub 2004 Apr 6. Biol Cybern. 2004. PMID: 15085348
-
The corpus callosum and the visual cortex: plasticity is a game for two.Neural Plast. 2012;2012:838672. doi: 10.1155/2012/838672. Epub 2012 Jun 21. Neural Plast. 2012. PMID: 22792494 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Visual callosal connections: role in visual processing in health and disease.Rev Neurosci. 2014;25(1):113-27. doi: 10.1515/revneuro-2013-0025. Rev Neurosci. 2014. PMID: 24127537 Review.
Cited by
-
Monocular retinal degeneration induced by intravitreal injection of sodium iodate in rabbit eyes.Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2016 May;60(3):226-37. doi: 10.1007/s10384-016-0429-1. Epub 2016 Feb 23. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2016. PMID: 26902976
References
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources