Comparison of the frictional coefficients for selected archwire-bracket slot combinations in the dry and wet states
- PMID: 1763840
- DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1991)061<0293:COTFCF>2.0.CO;2
Comparison of the frictional coefficients for selected archwire-bracket slot combinations in the dry and wet states
Erratum in
- Angle Orthod 1993 Fall;63(3):164
Abstract
Coefficients of friction were evaluated in the dry and wet (saliva) states for stainless steel, cobalt-chromium, nickel titanium, and beta-titanium wires against either stainless steel or polycrystalline alumina brackets. For both operators' experiments, an 0.010" stainless steel ligature wire pressed each archwire into the 0.018" or 0.022" bracket slot at 34 degrees C. In the dry state and regardless of slot size, the mean kinetic coefficients of friction were smallest for the all-stainless steel combinations (0.14) and largest for the beta-titanium wire combinations (0.46). The coefficients of the polycrystalline alumina combinations were generally greater than the corresponding combinations that included stainless steel brackets. In the wet state, the kinetic coefficients of the all-stainless steel combinations increased up to 0.05 over the dry state. In contrast, all beta-titanium wire combinations in the wet state decreased to 50% of the values in the dry state. The mixed reports that saliva may promote adhesive and lubricious behaviors may have some substance.
Similar articles
-
Coefficients of friction for arch wires in stainless steel and polycrystalline alumina bracket slots. I. The dry state.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990 Oct;98(4):300-12. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81487-8. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990. PMID: 2220691 Review.
-
Resistance to sliding of titanium brackets tested against stainless steel and beta-titanium archwires with second-order angulation in the dry and wet states.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Mar;131(3):400-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.07.019. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007. PMID: 17346598
-
An in vitro investigation on friction generated by ceramic brackets.World J Orthod. 2010 Winter;11(4):e133-44. World J Orthod. 2010. PMID: 21490982
-
Frictional resistances using Teflon-coated ligatures with various bracket-archwire combinations.Angle Orthod. 1995;65(1):63-72; discussion 73-4. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1995)065<0063:FRUTLW>2.0.CO;2. Angle Orthod. 1995. PMID: 7726464
-
Torque expression in stainless steel orthodontic brackets. A systematic review.Angle Orthod. 2010 Jan;80(1):201-10. doi: 10.2319/080508-352.1. Angle Orthod. 2010. PMID: 19852662 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Mechanical properties of orthodontic wires covered with a polyether ether ketone tube.Angle Orthod. 2018 Jul;88(4):442-449. doi: 10.2319/082417-572.1. Epub 2018 Mar 21. Angle Orthod. 2018. PMID: 29561658 Free PMC article.
-
Debris and friction of self-ligating and conventional orthodontic brackets after clinical use.Angle Orthod. 2015 Jul;85(4):673-7. doi: 10.2319/012914-80.1. Epub 2014 Sep 24. Angle Orthod. 2015. PMID: 25251040 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Cleansing orthodontic brackets with air-powder polishing: effects on frictional force and degree of debris.Dental Press J Orthod. 2016 Jul-Aug;21(4):60-5. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.21.4.060-065.oar. Dental Press J Orthod. 2016. PMID: 27653265 Free PMC article.
-
Development of a standardized testing system for orthodontic sliding mechanics.Prog Orthod. 2015;16:14. doi: 10.1186/s40510-015-0087-8. Epub 2015 Jun 4. Prog Orthod. 2015. PMID: 26061991 Free PMC article.
-
Biomechanical analysis of initial incisor crowding alignment in the periodontally reduced mandible using the finite element method.J Orofac Orthop. 2019 Jul;80(4):184-193. doi: 10.1007/s00056-019-00179-5. Epub 2019 May 28. J Orofac Orthop. 2019. PMID: 31139844 English.