Breaking strength of barbed polypropylene sutures: rater-blinded, controlled comparison with nonbarbed sutures of various calibers
- PMID: 17638730
- DOI: 10.1001/archderm.143.7.869
Breaking strength of barbed polypropylene sutures: rater-blinded, controlled comparison with nonbarbed sutures of various calibers
Erratum in
- Arch Dermatol. 2007 Sep;143(9):1186. Rashid, Rashid [corrected to Rashid, Rashid M]
Abstract
Objectives: To assess the strength of 2.0 barbed polypropylene suture, and, specifically, to determine the load required to break this suture, and to compare this with the strength of nonbarbed polypropylene suture.
Design: Rater-blinded, controlled trial. The individual responsible for setting up the experimental conditions was not blinded.
Setting: Biomechanics laboratory in an academic medical center.
Materials: This study did not include human subjects. Materials used included six 2.0 barbed polypropylene sutures and 3 each of 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, and 5.0 nonbarbed polypropylene sutures. Each suture was randomly selected from a different batch or box of similar sutures.
Intervention: Each suture was strung between 2 (top and bottom) cylinders and tied with a surgeon's knot. A tensile testing device was used to apply increasing force until the suture broke. Data were acquired through an analog-to-digital board on an IBM-compatible computer using commercially available software.
Main outcome measures: Ultimate strength, stiffness, and elongation before suture rupture.
Results: Strength of the barbed sutures (mean [SD] ultimate strength, 39.5 [9.0] N) was intermediate between that of 2.0 (55.0 N) and 3.0 (36.4 N) nonbarbed sutures and was not significantly different from that of 3.0 nonbarbed sutures (P = .5). Barbed 2.0 polypropylene sutures differed significantly (P < .001) from each of the other types of nonbarbed sutures on measures of stiffness and elongation. Elongation of barbed sutures was closest to that of 3.0 nonbarbed sutures (P = .002). Stiffness of the barbed sutures (mean [SD], 4.7 [0.7] N/mm) was markedly in excess of that of any of the other suture types (P < .001).
Conclusions: Barbed 2.0 polypropylene sutures seem to be at least as strong as 3.0 nonbarbed polypropylene sutures. As such, barbed sutures are significantly stronger than their rated strength, which has been stated as comparable to 4.0 nonbarbed sutures. This has implications for the long-term in vivo safety of barbed sutures.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of strength of sacrocolpopexy mesh attachment using barbed and nonbarbed sutures.Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Jan;29(1):153-159. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3451-z. Epub 2017 Oct 4. Int Urogynecol J. 2018. PMID: 28980021
-
Arthroscopic suture material and knot type: an updated biomechanical analysis.Am J Sports Med. 2009 Aug;37(8):1578-85. doi: 10.1177/0363546509332816. Epub 2009 May 26. Am J Sports Med. 2009. PMID: 19470946
-
Barbed versus smooth poly-propylene three-loop pulley sutures for repair of canine gastrocnemius tendon.Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2014;27(6):436-40. doi: 10.3415/VCOT-14-06-0089. Epub 2014 Oct 20. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2014. PMID: 25328081
-
Barbed sutures "lunch time" lifting: evidence-based efficacy.J Cosmet Dermatol. 2010 Jun;9(2):132-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1473-2165.2010.00495.x. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2010. PMID: 20618559 Review.
-
Reduction of face and neck laxity with anchored, barbed polypropylene sutures (Contour Threads).Skin Therapy Lett. 2006 Feb;11(1):5-7. Skin Therapy Lett. 2006. PMID: 16485061 Review.
Cited by
-
Advances in suture material for obstetric and gynecologic surgery.Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Summer;2(3):146-58. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2009. PMID: 19826572 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of newer unidirectional and bidirectional barbed suture on vesicourethral anastomosis during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and its comparison with polyglecaprone-25 suture: an initial experience.Int Urol Nephrol. 2012 Feb;44(1):125-32. doi: 10.1007/s11255-011-9967-0. Epub 2011 Apr 27. Int Urol Nephrol. 2012. PMID: 21523325 Clinical Trial.
-
Facial thread lifting with suture suspension.Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Nov-Dec;83(6):712-719. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2017.03.015. Epub 2017 May 9. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2017. PMID: 28549872 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Unidirectional barbed sutures vs. interrupted intracorporeal knots in thoracoscopic repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in pediatrics.Front Pediatr. 2024 Jan 18;12:1348753. doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1348753. eCollection 2024. Front Pediatr. 2024. PMID: 38304747 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of bidirectional barbed versus conventional monofilament suture material for closure of feline perineal urethrostomies.Can Vet J. 2022 Nov;63(11):1135-1140. Can Vet J. 2022. PMID: 36325412 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials