Variance of landmarks in digital evaluations: comparison between CT-based and conventional digital lateral cephalometric radiographs
- PMID: 17639277
- DOI: 10.1007/s00056-007-0710-5
Variance of landmarks in digital evaluations: comparison between CT-based and conventional digital lateral cephalometric radiographs
Abstract
Aim: The aim of this study was to examine whether bony, dental and soft tissue landmarks could be placed in CT-based lateral cephalograms with the same precision as in conventional digital lateral cephalograms.
Materials and methods: Nine patients without craniofacial dysplasia (2 female, 7 male, aged 12.8-32.3) who had undergone a lateral cephalogram and CT examination within an interval of a maximum of 6.5 months were selected in retrospect. The lateral cephalograms were done with the ORTHOPHOS Plus DS Ceph, and the CT examination with the SOMATOM Sensation 16 or 64 scanner. The CT-based cephalograms were generated with the VoXim 4.3 program based on axial CT reconstructions in the bone window. The cephalograms were analyzed using the Onyx Ceph 2.7 software by 2 orthodontists and 5 postgraduate students, each cephalogram being examined five times by each examiner on different days. Statistics were compiled with SPSS 13.0 and 14.0 based on the deviation from the individual mean value of each landmark.
Results: The descriptive statistics showed in the conventional cephalogram, averaged over all 61 landmarks, a mean quartile range of on average 0.62 mm in the horizontal and 0.67 mm in the vertical axes. The CT-based cephalograms ranged between 0.64 mm horizontally and 0.74 mm vertically. The statistics comparing the two types of images with the Wilcoxon test for paired samples showed no significant difference.
Conclusion: When a CT scan is necessary for assessment of complex craniofacial dysplasias, an orthodontic-specific diagnosis is possible without having to resort to conventional X-rays of the skull. The data from this study demonstrate that it is possible to construct a cephalogram from CT data, which can be analyzed in the same way as a conventional cephalogram provided that the CT's field of view is large enough.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of the reliability of craniofacial anatomic landmarks based on cephalometric radiographs and three-dimensional CT scans.Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1997 Mar;34(2):111-6. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569_1997_034_0111_cotroc_2.3.co_2. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1997. PMID: 9138504
-
Effects of image enhancement on reliability of landmark identification in digital cephalometry.Indian J Dent Res. 2013 Jan-Feb;24(1):98-103. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.114958. Indian J Dent Res. 2013. PMID: 23852241
-
Measurements from conventional, digital and CT-derived cephalograms: a comparative study.Aust Orthod J. 2012 Nov;28(2):232-9. Aust Orthod J. 2012. PMID: 23304973
-
Comparison of the Reliability of Anatomic Landmarks based on PA Cephalometric Radiographs and 3D CT Scans in Patients with Facial Asymmetry.Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2011 Sep-Dec;4(3):213-23. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1112. Epub 2011 Apr 15. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2011. PMID: 27678229 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Accuracy of conventional versus cone-beam CT-synthesised lateral cephalograms for cephalometric analysis: A systematic review.J Orthod. 2024 Jun;51(2):160-176. doi: 10.1177/14653125231178038. Epub 2023 Jun 21. J Orthod. 2024. PMID: 37340975
Cited by
-
Bone condition of the maxillary zygomatic process prior to orthodontic anchorage plate fixation.J Orofac Orthop. 2015 Jan;76(1):3-13. doi: 10.1007/s00056-014-0261-5. Epub 2014 Nov 26. J Orofac Orthop. 2015. PMID: 25420944 Clinical Trial.
-
Assessing bone volume for orthodontic miniplate fixation below the maxillary frontal process.J Orofac Orthop. 2014 Sep;75(5):399-408. doi: 10.1007/s00056-014-0234-8. Epub 2014 Aug 28. J Orofac Orthop. 2014. PMID: 25158952
-
Influence of a programme of professional calibration in the variability of landmark identification using cone beam computed tomography-synthesized and conventional radiographic cephalograms.Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010 Oct;39(7):414-23. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/31924248. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010. PMID: 20841459 Free PMC article.
-
MRI vs. CT for orthodontic applications: comparison of two MRI protocols and three CT (multislice, cone-beam, industrial) technologies.J Orofac Orthop. 2016 Jul;77(4):251-61. doi: 10.1007/s00056-016-0028-2. Epub 2016 Apr 20. J Orofac Orthop. 2016. PMID: 27098643 English.
-
Measurements on 3D models of human skulls derived from two different cone beam CT scanners.Clin Oral Investig. 2011 Oct;15(5):721-7. doi: 10.1007/s00784-010-0440-8. Epub 2010 Jul 17. Clin Oral Investig. 2011. PMID: 20640463
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials