Pre-admission consultation and late referral in infants with neonatal cholestasis
- PMID: 17640283
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2007.01170.x
Pre-admission consultation and late referral in infants with neonatal cholestasis
Abstract
Aims: To study factors leading to delayed referral in neonatal cholestasis at a tertiary centre in Malaysia.
Methods: A prospective, observational study on consecutive infants with neonatal cholestasis referred to a tertiary unit paediatric liver unit in Malaysia.
Results: Thirty-one of the 65 (43%) patients studied encountered delay or had an inappropriate action taken before referral. Factors leading to delayed referral, which adversely affected the outcome of biliary atresia (BA) and neonatal acute liver failure, were repeated reassurances by medical and paramedical staff (n = 17, 26%), failure of hospital services at the referring hospital (n = 7, 11%) and parental refusal for referral (n = 5, 8%). Only three (14%) of the 22 patients who developed liver failure had liver transplantation (LT). The 1-year survival rate with native liver for BA was 35%, while overall 1-year survival rate (native liver and LT) was 41%.
Conclusions: Repeated false reassurance, failure of hospital services and parental refusal all contributed to delayed referral in neonatal cholestasis. In addition to education of medical and public health workers, and parents on the importance of early referral in neonatal cholestasis, health authorities in Malaysia should consider the feasibility of universal stool colour screening in newborn infants to improve the outcome of BA.
Similar articles
-
Outcome of biliary atresia in Malaysia: a single-centre study.J Paediatr Child Health. 2009 May;45(5):279-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2009.01490.x. J Paediatr Child Health. 2009. PMID: 19493120
-
Aetiology and outcome of neonatal cholestasis in Malaysia.Singapore Med J. 2010 May;51(5):434-9. Singapore Med J. 2010. PMID: 20593150
-
Neonatal cholestasis: differentiation of biliary atresia from neonatal hepatitis in a developing country.Acta Paediatr. 2009 Aug;98(8):1260-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2009.01338.x. Epub 2009 May 13. Acta Paediatr. 2009. PMID: 19469771
-
Cholestasis in infancy: 2.Br J Hosp Med. 1994 Feb 2-15;51(3):105-7. Br J Hosp Med. 1994. PMID: 8193831 Review.
-
Neonatal cholestasis syndrome: Indian scene.Indian J Pediatr. 1999;66(1 Suppl):S94-6. Indian J Pediatr. 1999. PMID: 11132478 Review.
Cited by
-
Usefulness of a scoring system in the interpretation of histology in neonatal cholestasis.World J Gastroenterol. 2009 Nov 14;15(42):5326-33. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.5326. World J Gastroenterol. 2009. PMID: 19908342 Free PMC article.
-
Neonatal Cholestasis.Neoreviews. 2013 Feb 1;14(2):10.1542/neo.14-2-e63. doi: 10.1542/neo.14-2-e63. Neoreviews. 2013. PMID: 24244109 Free PMC article.
-
Patient-reported outcome and experience domains for diagnostic excellence: a scoping review to inform future measure development.Qual Life Res. 2024 Nov;33(11):2883-2897. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03709-w. Epub 2024 Jun 8. Qual Life Res. 2024. PMID: 38850395 Free PMC article.
-
Surgical referrals in Northern Tanzania: a prospective assessment of rates, preventability, reasons and patterns.BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Aug 8;20(1):725. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05559-x. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020. PMID: 32771008 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of cholestasis in Iranian infants less than three months of age.Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2015 Winter;8(1):42-8. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2015. PMID: 25584175 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources