Inferences under time pressure: how opportunity costs affect strategy selection
- PMID: 17640605
- DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.05.004
Inferences under time pressure: how opportunity costs affect strategy selection
Abstract
Do the inference strategies people select depend on the magnitude of time pressure? Is this dependency modified by the type of time pressure? These questions are addressed in three experimental studies in which participants made inferences after having searched for information on a computerized information board. In Study 1, time pressure was induced indirectly by imposing opportunity costs of being slow, a form of time pressure that is common in daily life but that has rarely been examined in the literature. A simple lexicographic heuristic (LEX) achieved the best fit in predicting participants' inferences. Studies 2 and 3 induced high time pressure either indirectly by imposing opportunity costs in terms of time or directly by limiting the time for each choice. Regardless of how time pressure was induced, under high time pressure the inferences could be best predicted with LEX, whereas under low time pressure a weighted linear model that integrates all available information predicted the inferences best. We conclude that people select strategies adaptively depending on characteristics of the situation.
Similar articles
-
SSL: a theory of how people learn to select strategies.J Exp Psychol Gen. 2006 May;135(2):207-36. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.135.2.207. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2006. PMID: 16719651 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparative judgments with missing information: a regression and process tracing analysis.Acta Psychol (Amst). 2007 May;125(1):66-84. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.06.005. Epub 2006 Sep 1. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2007. PMID: 16949538
-
[Group communication and decision-making strategies].Psicothema. 2008 Nov;20(4):753-9. Psicothema. 2008. PMID: 18940079 Spanish.
-
Crisis decision theory: decisions in the face of negative events.Psychol Bull. 2008 Jan;134(1):61-76. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.1.61. Psychol Bull. 2008. PMID: 18193995 Review.
-
Neural basis of deciding, choosing and acting.Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001 Jan;2(1):33-42. doi: 10.1038/35049054. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001. PMID: 11253357 Review.
Cited by
-
Beyond collective intelligence: Collective adaptation.J R Soc Interface. 2023 Mar;20(200):20220736. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2022.0736. Epub 2023 Mar 22. J R Soc Interface. 2023. PMID: 36946092 Free PMC article. Review.
-
On the suitability of fast and frugal heuristics for designing values clarification methods in patient decision aids: a critical analysis.Health Expect. 2013 Sep;16(3):e73-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00720.x. Epub 2011 Sep 8. Health Expect. 2013. PMID: 21902770 Free PMC article.
-
Time pressure effects on decision-making in intertemporal loss scenarios: an eye-tracking study.Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 11;15:1451674. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1451674. eCollection 2024. Front Psychol. 2024. PMID: 39463459 Free PMC article.
-
A conceptual model for generating and validating in-session clinical judgments.Psychother Res. 2018 Jan;28(1):91-105. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2016.1169329. Epub 2016 Apr 18. Psychother Res. 2018. PMID: 27088962 Free PMC article.
-
Machine learning strategy identification: A paradigm to uncover decision strategies with high fidelity.Behav Res Methods. 2023 Jan;55(1):263-284. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01828-1. Epub 2022 Apr 4. Behav Res Methods. 2023. PMID: 35378675
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical