The value of adenosine test in the diagnosis of sick sinus syndrome: susceptibility of sinus and atrioventricular node to adenosine in patients with sick sinus syndrome and unexplained syncope
- PMID: 17640925
- DOI: 10.1093/europace/eum099
The value of adenosine test in the diagnosis of sick sinus syndrome: susceptibility of sinus and atrioventricular node to adenosine in patients with sick sinus syndrome and unexplained syncope
Abstract
Aims: Patients (pts) with sick sinus syndrome (SSS) and unexplained syncope show increased susceptibility of sinus and atrioventricular node (AVN) to intravenous adenosine, respectively. Our aim is to assess the diagnostic value of adenosine test in pts with SSS, as well as to evaluate the response of AVN to adenosine either in pts with unexplained syncope or in pts with syncope and known SSS.
Methods and results: The effect of adenosine administration on the sinus and AVN was studied in a population consisted of 19 pts with clinical SSS (group SSS), 7 pts with syncope of unknown origin (group SUO), and 12 control subjects (group C). We calculated the maximum corrected sinus node recovery time (CSNRT), after overdrive pacing of the atrium at cycle lengths of 600, 500, and 400 ms and compared this value with the longest sinus pause, following adenosine administration corrected to the basic cycle length (ADSNRT). The longest R-R interval during atrioventricular block in response to adenosine injection (ADAVB) was also measured. Adenosine was given in a bolus dose of 0.15 mgr/kg through a femoral or large antecubital vein. There was a significant difference in the mean values of CSNRT among the three groups: group SSS (651 +/- 228 ms) > group SUO (284 +/- 100 ms) = group C (291 +/- 117 ms), F(2.35) = 19.078, P = 0.000. A significant difference was also found with ADSNRT: group SSS (5437 +/- 6863 ms) > group SUO (122 +/- 120 ms) = group C (801 +/- 1897 ms), F(2.35) = 4.513, P = 0.018. Using 525 ms as a cutoff value indicating sinus node dysfunction, CSNRT had a sensitivity of 74% and specificity of 100% for diagnosis of SSS while ADSNRT had 94% and 84%, respectively. Higher values of ADAVB in pts with SSS (10659 +/- 5872) and SUO (10026 +/- 7092) in comparison with controls (3615 +/- 5002) were measured, F(2.35) = 5.697, P = 0.007. No difference in the degree of ADAVB was found between the pts with SUO (10026 +/- 7092 ms) and syncope in the presence of SSS (12058 +/- 6787 ms), F(1.15) = 0.356, P = 0.56.
Conclusion: Adenosine test appears to be at least comparable with CSNRT in making the diagnosis of SSS and may be considered as an alternative non-invasive test for confirmation of suspected SSS. No difference in the susceptibility of AVN to adenosine between the pts with syncope in the presence of SSS and those with unexplained syncope was found, suggesting that adenosine test cannot be used to diagnose atrioventricular block as the cause of syncope.
Comment in
-
Should the 'adenosine-challenge test' be part of the routine work-up for syncope?Europace. 2007 Aug;9(8):557-8. doi: 10.1093/europace/eum135. Epub 2007 Jul 17. Europace. 2007. PMID: 17639069 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Sinus nodal response to adenosine relates to the severity of sinus node dysfunction.Europace. 2012 Jun;14(6):859-64. doi: 10.1093/europace/eur399. Epub 2011 Dec 26. Europace. 2012. PMID: 22201017 Clinical Trial.
-
Cardioinhibitory carotid sinus hypersensitivity predicts an asystolic mechanism of spontaneous neurally mediated syncope.Europace. 2007 Aug;9(8):563-7. doi: 10.1093/europace/eum092. Epub 2007 May 16. Europace. 2007. PMID: 17507364
-
[Binodal disease: diseased sinus node and atrioventricular block].Z Kardiol. 1983 Jul;72(7):410-3. Z Kardiol. 1983. PMID: 6613237 German.
-
[Sinus node syndrome].Z Kardiol. 1975 Aug;64(8):697-721. Z Kardiol. 1975. PMID: 1099830 Review. German.
-
Adenosine test in the diagnosis of unexplained syncope: marker of conducting tissue disease or neurally mediated syncope?Eur Heart J. 2006 Jun;27(12):1396-400. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi844. Epub 2006 Mar 30. Eur Heart J. 2006. PMID: 16574690 Review.
Cited by
-
Redundant and diverse intranodal pacemakers and conduction pathways protect the human sinoatrial node from failure.Sci Transl Med. 2017 Jul 26;9(400):eaam5607. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aam5607. Sci Transl Med. 2017. PMID: 28747516 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation and management of bradycardia in neonates and children.Eur J Pediatr. 2016 Feb;175(2):151-61. doi: 10.1007/s00431-015-2689-z. Epub 2016 Jan 16. Eur J Pediatr. 2016. PMID: 26780751 Review.
-
Is the Adenosine Test Obsolete in the Clinical Assessment of Syncope of Unknown Origin?Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2021 Dec;10(4):230-234. doi: 10.15420/aer.2021.39. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2021. PMID: 35106173 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Adenosine receptors and the heart: role in regulation of coronary blood flow and cardiac electrophysiology.Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2009;(193):161-88. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-89615-9_6. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2009. PMID: 19639282 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cardiac purinergic signalling in health and disease.Purinergic Signal. 2015 Mar;11(1):1-46. doi: 10.1007/s11302-014-9436-1. Epub 2014 Dec 20. Purinergic Signal. 2015. PMID: 25527177 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous