Preferences for partner notification method: variation in responses between respondents as index patients and contacts
- PMID: 17650574
- DOI: 10.1258/095646207781147238
Preferences for partner notification method: variation in responses between respondents as index patients and contacts
Abstract
There have been very few studies focusing on what form of communication patients would find acceptable from a clinic. This study looks at the differences in preferences for various partner notification methods when the respondents were index patients compared with when they had to be contacted because a partner had a sexually transmitted infection (STI). There were 2544 respondents. When the clinic had to notify partners, respondents were more likely to report the method as good when a partner had an STI and they were being contacted compared with when the respondents had an infection and the partner was being contacted. The opposite was true for patient referral partner notification. Therefore, there are variations in the preferences of respondents for partner notification method, which depend on whether they see themselves as index patients or contacts.
Similar articles
-
Patient preferences for partner notification.Sex Transm Infect. 2006 Aug;82(4):327-9. doi: 10.1136/sti.2005.018119. Sex Transm Infect. 2006. PMID: 16877586 Free PMC article.
-
Adolescent patient preferences surrounding partner notification and treatment for sexually transmitted infections.Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Jan;22(1):61-6. doi: 10.1111/acem.12557. Epub 2014 Dec 24. Acad Emerg Med. 2015. PMID: 25545855 Free PMC article.
-
HIV partner notification is effective and feasible in sub-Saharan Africa: opportunities for HIV treatment and prevention.J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2011 Apr 15;56(5):437-42. doi: 10.1097/qai.0b013e318202bf7d. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2011. PMID: 22046601 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Partner notification for sexually transmitted diseases.Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Apr 1;44 Suppl 3:S160-74. doi: 10.1086/511429. Clin Infect Dis. 2007. PMID: 17342669 Review.
-
Acceptability and efficacy of partner notification for curable sexually transmitted infections in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review.Int J STD AIDS. 2019 Mar;30(3):292-303. doi: 10.1177/0956462418803983. Epub 2018 Nov 5. Int J STD AIDS. 2019. PMID: 30396318 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Perspectives on voluntary assisted partner notification among providers, people with HIV and the general population in Indonesia: a formative qualitative study.BMC Public Health. 2021 Jan 30;21(1):254. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10332-8. BMC Public Health. 2021. PMID: 33516201 Free PMC article.
-
Telling partners about chlamydia: how acceptable are the new technologies?BMC Infect Dis. 2010 Mar 9;10:58. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-10-58. BMC Infect Dis. 2010. PMID: 20211029 Free PMC article.
-
Current practices of partner notification among MSM with HIV, gonorrhoea and syphilis in the Netherlands: an urgent need for improvement.BMC Infect Dis. 2012 May 14;12:114. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-12-114. BMC Infect Dis. 2012. PMID: 22583517 Free PMC article.
-
Public health opportunities and challenges in the provision of partner notification services: the New England experience.BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jan 31;18(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2890-7. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018. PMID: 29386023 Free PMC article.
-
Anticipated Notification of Sexual Partners following STD Diagnosis among Men Who Have Sex with Men and Transgender Women in Lima, Peru: A Mixed Methods Analysis.PLoS One. 2016 Sep 29;11(9):e0163905. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163905. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27685158 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical