Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007;32(1):543-62.
doi: 10.1080/87565640701361013.

Effects of gender and age on motor exam in typically developing children

Affiliations

Effects of gender and age on motor exam in typically developing children

Jennifer C Gidley Larson et al. Dev Neuropsychol. 2007.

Abstract

Few studies have contrasted performance of typically developing boys and girls on standardized motor assessment. In the present study, developmental status of the motor system was assessed in 144 typically developing children (72 boys, 72 girls, ages 7-14), using the Physical and Neurological Examination for Subtle Signs (PANESS, Denckla, 1985). Four summary variables were examined: (1) Gaits and Stations, (2) Overflow, (3) Dysrythmia, and (4) Timed Movements. For most variables, gender differences were not significant; however significant gender effects were observed for some subtle signs (involuntary movements), gaits and stations, and timed patterned movements. In all instances, girls showed fewer subtle signs and were faster and more proficient than boys. Significant age-related changes were observed for some subtle signs (dysrythmia and overflow), and for timed movements. In contrast, by age 7, many of the skills assessed by the PANESS have reached "adult" level in typically developing children. Motor development appears to follow a different developmental course in girls than in boys; separate gender and age norms should be used in clinical assessment of motor function in children.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Gender differences on Gaits and Stations tasks and timed patterned movements. In all tasks in which there were gender–related differences, the girls performed better and quicker than the boys.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adams R, Kocsis J, Estes R. Soft neurological signs in learning-disabled children and controls. American Journal of Diseases of Children. 1974;128:614–618. - PubMed
    1. Annett M. The growth of manual preference and speed. British Journal of Psychology. 1970;61:545–558. - PubMed
    1. Barnett AL, Peters J. Motor proficiency assessment batteries. In: Dewey D, Tupper D, editors. Developmental motor disorders: A neuropsychological prospective. New York: The Guilford Press; 2004. pp. 66–83.
    1. Chen R, Gerloff C, Hallett M, Cohen L. Involvement of the ipsilateral motor cortex in finger movements of different complexities. Annals of Neurology. 1997;41:247–254. - PubMed
    1. De Bellis M, Keshavan MS, Beers S, Hall J, Frustaci K, Masalehdan A, et al. Sex differences in brain maturation during childhood and adolescence. Cerebral Cortex. 2001;11:552–557. - PubMed

Publication types