Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Jul 25:7:24.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-7-24.

A systematic review of tests of empathy in medicine

Joanne M Hemmerdinger  1 , Samuel D R Stoddart, Richard J Lilford
Affiliations

A systematic review of tests of empathy in medicine

Joanne M Hemmerdinger et al. BMC Med Educ. .

Abstract

Background: Empathy is frequently cited as an important attribute in physicians and some groups have expressed a desire to measure empathy either at selection for medical school or during medical (or postgraduate) training. In order to do this, a reliable and valid test of empathy is required. The purpose of this systematic review is to determine the reliability and validity of existing tests for the assessment of medical empathy.

Methods: A systematic review of research papers relating to the reliability and validity of tests of empathy in medical students and doctors. Journal databases (Medline, EMBASE, and PsycINFO) were searched for English-language articles relating to the assessment of empathy and related constructs in applicants to medical school, medical students, and doctors.

Results: From 1147 citations, we identified 50 relevant papers describing 36 different instruments of empathy measurement. As some papers assessed more than one instrument, there were 59 instrument assessments. 20 of these involved only medical students, 30 involved only practising clinicians, and three involved only medical school applicants. Four assessments involved both medical students and practising clinicians, and two studies involved both medical school applicants and students. Eight instruments demonstrated evidence of reliability, internal consistency, and validity. Of these, six were self-rated measures, one was a patient-rated measure, and one was an observer-rated measure.

Conclusion: A number of empathy measures available have been psychometrically assessed for research use among medical students and practising medical doctors. No empathy measures were found with sufficient evidence of predictive validity for use as selection measures for medical school. However, measures with a sufficient evidential base to support their use as tools for investigating the role of empathy in medical training and clinical care are available.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of paper selection process.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Redmond MV. The relationship between perceived communication competence and perceived empathy. Communication Monographs. 1985;52:377–382.
    1. Marley J, Carmen I. Selecting medical students: a case report of the need for change. Medical Education. 1999;33:455–459. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.1999.00345.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McManus IC, Powis DA, Wakeford R, Ferguson E, James D, Richards P. Intellectual aptitude tests and A levels for selecting UK school leaver entrants for medical school. British Medical Journal. 2005;331:555–559. doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7516.555. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hojat M, Gonnella JS, Nasca TJ, Mangione S, Vergare M, Magee M. Physician empathy: definition, components, measurement, and relationship to gender and specialty. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2002;159:1563–1569. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.159.9.1563. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Evans GW, Wilt DL, Alligood MR, O'Neil M. Empathy: a study of two types. Issues in Mental Health Nursing. 1998;19:453–461. doi: 10.1080/016128498248890. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types