A pilot qualitative study of New Zealand policymakers' knowledge of, and attitudes to, the tobacco industry
- PMID: 17651500
- PMCID: PMC2042493
- DOI: 10.1186/1743-8462-4-17
A pilot qualitative study of New Zealand policymakers' knowledge of, and attitudes to, the tobacco industry
Abstract
Background: The actions of policymakers are critical to advancing tobacco control. To evaluate the feasibility of using anonymous in-depth interviews to ascertain policymakers' knowledge about, and attitudes to, the tobacco industry, we undertook a pilot study involving New Zealand policymakers.
Methods: Five politicians (from different political parties) and five senior officials, who were involved in tobacco control policy, were recruited for semi-structured, anonymous, face-to-face interviews.
Results: Recruitment of appropriate senior policymakers was found to be possible. Interviewees were willing to answer questions fully and frankly about their knowledge and views of the tobacco industry.The preliminary data from this pilot suggest that some New Zealand politicians appeared to see contact with the industry as similar to contact with other groups, whereas the officials indicated at least a different style of relationship. Only one politician knew if their party accepted funding from tobacco companies. All but one of the interviewees thought that promotion of tobacco to under-16 s still occurs, albeit indirectly. The interviewees' knowledge of the investment in tobacco industries by New Zealand government agencies was low or absent.While most of those interviewed showed scepticism about tobacco company public relations efforts, this was absent in some cases. There was a wide understanding that the tobacco industry will use many tactics in the pursuit of profit, and to counteract government efforts to reduce the harm from smoking.
Conclusion: In-depth anonymous interviews appear to be feasible and can be productive for exploring sensitive tobacco-related policy issues with policymakers. The preliminary data from this group of New Zealand policymakers suggest important knowledge gaps, but also general distrust of this industry. From a tobacco control perspective, the results may suggest a greater focus by advocates on the funding of political parties by the tobacco industry, and on government agency investment in the tobacco industry.
Similar articles
-
Public, private and personal: qualitative research on policymakers' opinions on smokefree interventions to protect children in 'private' spaces.BMC Public Health. 2010 Dec 31;10:797. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-797. BMC Public Health. 2010. PMID: 21194440 Free PMC article.
-
Regulatory chills: tobacco industry legal threats and the politics of tobacco standardised packaging in New Zealand.N Z Med J. 2018 Apr 13;131(1473):25-41. N Z Med J. 2018. PMID: 29649194 Free PMC article.
-
Health policymakers' knowledge and opinions of physicians smoking and tobacco policy control in Lao PDR.BMC Public Health. 2012 Sep 21;12:816. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-816. BMC Public Health. 2012. PMID: 22998748 Free PMC article.
-
Tobacco industry tactics for resisting public policy on health.Bull World Health Organ. 2000;78(7):902-10. Bull World Health Organ. 2000. PMID: 10994263 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Smokefree cars in New Zealand: rapid research among stakeholders on attitudes and future directions.N Z Med J. 2009 Sep 25;122(1303):54-66. N Z Med J. 2009. PMID: 19851420 Review.
Cited by
-
Tobacco industry denormalisation as a tobacco control intervention: a review.Tob Control. 2012 Mar;21(2):162-70. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050200. Tob Control. 2012. PMID: 22345240 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Policymakers and the example of smoking to children: A qualitative study.Tob Induc Dis. 2011 Jan 22;9(1):1. doi: 10.1186/1617-9625-9-1. Tob Induc Dis. 2011. PMID: 21255457 Free PMC article.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources