Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Aug;16(4):235-8.
doi: 10.1136/tc.2006.018614.

Legislation reduces exposure to second-hand tobacco smoke in New Zealand bars by about 90%

Affiliations

Legislation reduces exposure to second-hand tobacco smoke in New Zealand bars by about 90%

Dinusha Fernando et al. Tob Control. 2007 Aug.

Abstract

Aim: To measure exposure to second-hand smoke (SHS) in New Zealand bars before and after comprehensive smoke-free legislation enacted on 10 December 2004.

Methods: Cotinine is the main specific metabolite of nicotine and a well-established biomarker for SHS exposure. We measured cotinine levels in saliva of non-smoking volunteers before and after a 3 h visit to 30 randomly selected bars in 3 cities across the country. Two measures of cotinine before the smoke-free law change during winter and spring 2004, and two follow-up measurements in the same volunteers and venues during winter and spring 2005, were included.

Results: Before the smoke-free law change, in all bars and in all volunteers, exposure to SHS was evident with an average increase in saliva cotinine of 0.66 ng/ml (SE 0.03 ng/ml). Increases in cotinine correlated strongly with the volunteers' subjective observation of ventilation, air quality and counts of lit cigarettes. However, even venues that were judged to be "seemingly smoke free" with "good ventilation" produced discernable levels of SHS exposure. After the law change, there remained some exposure to SHS, but at much lower levels (mean saliva cotinine increase of 0.08 ng/ml, SE 0.01 ng/ml). Smoking indoors in bars was almost totally eliminated: in 2005 only one lit cigarette was observed in 30 visits.

Conclusions: Comprehensive smoke-free legislation in New Zealand seems to have reduced exposure of bar patrons to SHS by about 90%. Residual exposures to SHS in bars do not result from illicit smoking indoors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mulcahy M, Evans D S, Hammond S K.et al Secondhand smoke exposure and risk following the Irish smoking ban: an assessment of salivary cotinine concentrations in hotel workers and air nicotine levels in bars. Tob Control 200514384–388. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Farrelly M C, Nonnemaker J M, Chon R.et al Changes in hospitality workers' exposure to secondhand smoke following the implementation of New York's smoke‐free laws. Tob Control 200514236–241. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Menzies D, Nair A, Williamson P A.et al Respiratory symptoms, pulmonary function, and markers of inflammation among bar workers before and after a legislative ban on smoking in public places. JAMA 20062961742–1748. - PubMed
    1. Eisner M D, Smith A K, Blanc P D. Bartenders' respiratory health after establishment of smoke‐free bars and taverns. JAMA 19982801909–1914. - PubMed
    1. Fowles J, Christophersen A, Fernando D.et al Secondhand tobacco smoke exposure in New Zealand bars: results prior to implementation of the bar smoking ban. NZ Med J 2006119U1931 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms