Similar articles

• Additional double reading of screening mammograms by radiologic technologists: impact on screening performance parameters.

  Duijm LE, Groenewoud JH, Fracheboud J, de Koning HJ. Duijm LE, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 Aug 1;99(15):1162-70. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djm050. Epub 2007 Jul 24. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007. PMID: 17652282
• Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms.

  Skaane P, Kshirsagar A, Stapleton S, Young K, Castellino RA. Skaane P, et al. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Feb;188(2):377-84. doi: 10.2214/AJR.05.2207. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007. PMID: 17242245
• Blinded comparison of computer-aided detection with human second reading in screening mammography: the importance of the question and the critical numbers game.

  Brem RF. Brem RF. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Nov;189(5):1142-4. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.3118. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007. PMID: 17954652 No abstract available.
• Computer-aided detection in mammography.

  Astley SM, Gilbert FJ. Astley SM, et al. Clin Radiol. 2004 May;59(5):390-9. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2003.11.017. Clin Radiol. 2004. PMID: 15081844 Review.
• The manufacturer's perspective.

  Roehrig J. Roehrig J. Br J Radiol. 2005;78 Spec No 1:S41-5. doi: 10.1259/bjr/25058162. Br J Radiol. 2005. PMID: 15917445 Review.