Measures of effect: relative risks, odds ratios, risk difference, and 'number needed to treat'
- PMID: 17653136
- DOI: 10.1038/sj.ki.5002432
Measures of effect: relative risks, odds ratios, risk difference, and 'number needed to treat'
Abstract
Epidemiological studies aim at assessing the relationship between exposures and outcomes. Clinicians are interested in knowing not only whether a link between a given exposure (e.g. smoking) and a certain outcome (e.g. myocardial infarction) is statistically significant, but also the magnitude of this relationship. The 'measures of effect' are indexes that summarize the strength of the link between exposures and outcomes and can help the clinician in taking decisions in every day clinical practice. In epidemiological studies, the effect of exposure can be measured both in relative and absolute terms. The risk ratio, the incidence rate ratio, and the odds ratio are relative measures of effect. Risk difference is an absolute measure of effect and it is calculated by subtracting the risk of the outcome in exposed individuals from that of unexposed.
Similar articles
-
Measures of effect in epidemiological research.Nephron Clin Pract. 2010;115(2):c91-3. doi: 10.1159/000312870. Epub 2010 Apr 21. Nephron Clin Pract. 2010. PMID: 20407271 Review.
-
Estimating adjusted NNT measures in logistic regression analysis.Stat Med. 2007 Dec 30;26(30):5586-95. doi: 10.1002/sim.3061. Stat Med. 2007. PMID: 17879268
-
Odds ratio, relative risk, absolute risk reduction, and the number needed to treat--which of these should we use?Value Health. 2002 Sep-Oct;5(5):431-6. doi: 10.1046/J.1524-4733.2002.55150.x. Value Health. 2002. PMID: 12201860
-
An overview of standard statistical methods for assessing exposure-outcome link in survival analysis (Part I): basic concepts.Aging Clin Exp Res. 2012 Apr;24(2):109-12. doi: 10.1007/BF03325157. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2012. PMID: 22842830 Review.
-
Evidence-based dermatology: number needed to treat and its relation to other risk measures.J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007 Apr;56(4):664-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2006.08.024. Epub 2006 Oct 27. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007. PMID: 17367615 Review.
Cited by
-
Risk prediction of acute kidney injury in cardiac surgery and prevention using aminophylline.Indian J Nephrol. 2012 May;22(3):179-83. doi: 10.4103/0971-4065.98752. Indian J Nephrol. 2012. PMID: 23087551 Free PMC article.
-
Quantitative risk of positive family history in developing colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis.World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Aug 14;25(30):4278-4291. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i30.4278. World J Gastroenterol. 2019. PMID: 31435179 Free PMC article.
-
Time-dependent cardiovascular risks following pneumonia in inpatient and outpatient settings: A register-based cohort study.Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc Risk Prev. 2024 Aug 6;22:200317. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcrp.2024.200317. eCollection 2024 Sep. Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc Risk Prev. 2024. PMID: 39224118 Free PMC article.
-
Reply to Amacher et al.Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2023 Jul 19;37(1):ivad116. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivad116. Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2023. PMID: 37471604 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Preemptive kidney transplantation: a propensity score matched cohort study.Clin Exp Nephrol. 2017 Dec;21(6):1105-1112. doi: 10.1007/s10157-016-1345-x. Epub 2016 Oct 19. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2017. PMID: 27761671
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources