Systematic review of the effectiveness of population screening for colorectal cancer
- PMID: 17653247
Systematic review of the effectiveness of population screening for colorectal cancer
Abstract
Aim: To estimate the effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening with faecal occult blood testing (FOBT), flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS), and combinations of FOBT and FS in preventing colorectal cancer (CRC) deaths.
Method: A systematic review was conducted examining randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published between 1997 and 2004 inclusive. A systematic search of Medline, Embase, Current Contents, and the Cochrane Library was undertaken. Studies that evaluated screening with FOBT, FS or combinations of FOBT and FS, were appraised. A meta-analysis of population-based trials of FOBT was conducted.
Results: Four RCTs were identified that examined FOBT screening. The three trials that investigated guaiac-based FOBT found CRC mortality was reduced in the screening group. In the two population-based trials, the pooled relative risk was 0.86 (95%CI 0.79-0.93). A fourth RCT was identified, with shorter term follow-up, which considered FOBT screening combined with FS compared with FOBT alone. No significant reduction in CRC mortality was reported in this trial.
Conclusion: There is high-quality evidence showing that guaiac-based FOBT screening reduces mortality from CRC. No such evidence exists for screening with FS either alone, or in combination with FOBT, but this should be re-evaluated once data become available from four large ongoing trials.
Similar articles
-
Screening for colorectal cancer using the faecal occult blood test, Hemoccult.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jan 24;2007(1):CD001216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001216.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007. PMID: 17253456 Free PMC article.
-
Review in depth and meta-analysis of controlled trials on colorectal cancer screening by faecal occult blood test.Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006 Apr;18(4):427-33. doi: 10.1097/00042737-200604000-00018. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006. PMID: 16538116
-
[Population screening for colorectal cancer: a systematic review].Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004 Oct;27(8):450-9. doi: 10.1016/s0210-5705(03)70502-0. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004. PMID: 15388048 Spanish.
-
Systematic review with meta-analysis: the comparative effectiveness of aspirin vs. screening for colorectal cancer prevention.Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Jan;45(2):193-204. doi: 10.1111/apt.13857. Epub 2016 Nov 17. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017. PMID: 27859394
-
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11532236
Cited by
-
Improving uptake of screening for colorectal cancer: a study on invitation strategies and different test kit use.Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 May;27(5):536-43. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000314. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015. PMID: 25806603 Free PMC article.
-
The effectiveness of FOBT vs. FIT: A meta-analysis on colorectal cancer screening test.Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2016 May 9;30:366. eCollection 2016. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2016. PMID: 27493910 Free PMC article.
-
Primary and secondary prevention of colorectal cancer.Clin Med Insights Gastroenterol. 2014 Jul 14;7:33-46. doi: 10.4137/CGast.S14039. eCollection 2014. Clin Med Insights Gastroenterol. 2014. PMID: 25093007 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Gender differences in attitudes impeding colorectal cancer screening.BMC Public Health. 2013 May 24;13:500. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-500. BMC Public Health. 2013. PMID: 23706029 Free PMC article.
-
Silencing speckle-type POZ protein by promoter hypermethylation decreases cell apoptosis through upregulating Hedgehog signaling pathway in colorectal cancer.Cell Death Dis. 2016 Dec 29;7(12):e2569. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2016.435. Cell Death Dis. 2016. PMID: 28032859 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Other Literature Sources
Medical