PET/CT image registration: preliminary tests for its application to clinical dosimetry in radiotherapy
- PMID: 17654893
- DOI: 10.1118/1.2732031
PET/CT image registration: preliminary tests for its application to clinical dosimetry in radiotherapy
Abstract
The quality of dosimetry in radiotherapy treatment requires the accurate delimitation of the gross tumor volume. This can be achieved by complementing the anatomical detail provided by CT images through fusion with other imaging modalities that provide additional metabolic and physiological information. Therefore, use of multiple imaging modalities for radiotherapy treatment planning requires an accurate image registration method. This work describes tests carried out on a Discovery LS positron emission/computed tomography (PET/CT) system by General Electric Medical Systems (GEMS), for its later use to obtain images to delimit the target in radiotherapy treatment. Several phantoms have been used to verify image correlation, in combination with fiducial markers, which were used as a system of external landmarks. We analyzed the geometrical accuracy of two different fusion methods with the images obtained with these phantoms. We first studied the fusion method used by the PET/CT system by GEMS (hardware fusion) on the basis that there is satisfactory coincidence between the reconstruction centers in CT and PET systems; and secondly the fiducial fusion, a registration method, by means of least-squares fitting algorithm of a landmark points system. The study concluded with the verification of the centroid position of some phantom components in both imaging modalities. Centroids were estimated through a calculation similar to center-of-mass, weighted by the value of the CT number and the uptake intensity in PET. The mean deviations found for the hardware fusion method were: deltax/ +/-sigma = 3.3 mm +/- 1.0 mm and /deltax/ +/-sigma = 3.6 mm +/- 1.0 mm. These values were substantially improved upon applying fiducial fusion based on external landmark points: /deltax/ +/-sigma = 0.7 mm +/- 0.8 mm and /deltax/ +/-sigma = 0.3 mm 1.7 mm. We also noted that differences found for each of the fusion methods were similar for both the axial and helical CT image acquisition protocols.
Similar articles
-
Phantom validation of coregistration of PET and CT for image-guided radiotherapy.Med Phys. 2004 May;31(5):1083-92. doi: 10.1118/1.1688041. Med Phys. 2004. PMID: 15191296
-
[PET and CT cross-modality medical image fusion based on out-location frame].Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2010 Jun;30(6):1304-6. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2010. PMID: 20584663 Chinese.
-
[Multimodal medical image registration using cubic spline interpolation method].Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi. 2007 Dec;24(6):1241-5, 1259. Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi. 2007. PMID: 18232469 Chinese.
-
Dual-modality imaging: combining anatomy and function.J Nucl Med. 2008 Jun;49(6):938-55. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.051276. Epub 2008 May 15. J Nucl Med. 2008. PMID: 18483101 Review.
-
PET/CT: panacea, redundancy, or something in between?J Nucl Med. 2004 Jan;45 Suppl 1:15S-24S. J Nucl Med. 2004. PMID: 14736832 Review.
Cited by
-
Analyzing spatial distribution between 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose and 18F-boronophenylalanine positron emission tomography to investigate selection indicators for boron neutron capture therapy.EJNMMI Phys. 2022 Dec 19;9(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s40658-022-00514-7. EJNMMI Phys. 2022. PMID: 36536190 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical