Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2008 Feb 12;363(1491):495-515.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2166.

Drivers of change in global agriculture

Affiliations
Review

Drivers of change in global agriculture

Peter Hazell et al. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. .

Abstract

As a result of agricultural intensification, more food is produced today than needed to feed the entire world population and at prices that have never been so low. Yet despite this success and the impact of globalization and increasing world trade in agriculture, there remain large, persistent and, in some cases, worsening spatial differences in the ability of societies to both feed themselves and protect the long-term productive capacity of their natural resources. This paper explores these differences and develops a countryxfarming systems typology for exploring the linkages between human needs, agriculture and the environment, and for assessing options for addressing future food security, land use and ecosystem service challenges facing different societies around the world.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Global trends in food production and prices (index 1961–2005). Data from FAOSTAT (2006), IMF Yearbooks and World Bank (2005).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Global trends in the intensification of crop production (index 1961–2002/2005). Adapted from Cassman & Wood (2005), updated from FAOSTAT (; tractor and fertilizer data to 2002, land use to 2003, production to 2005).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Index of total agricultural output per capita by region (index 1961–2005). Adapted from FAOSTAT (2006).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Global trends in cereal yield by region (1961–2005). Adapted from FAOSTAT (2006).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adams R.M, Chen C, McCarl B.A, Weiher R.F. The economic consequences of ENSO events for agriculture. Clim. Res. 1999;13:165–172.
    1. Anderson J, Hazell P, Evans L. Variability in cereal yields: sources of change and implications for agricultural research and policy. Food Policy. 1987;12:199–212. doi:10.1016/0306-9192(77)90021-5 - DOI
    1. Barraclough S, Ghimire K. St Martin's Press, Inc; New York, NY: 1995. Forests and livelihoods: the social dynamics of deforestation in developing countries.
    1. Biggelaar D, Lal R, Wiebe K, Breneman V. Soil erosion impact on crop yields in North America. Adv. Agron. 2001;72:1–52.
    1. Bishop J, Allen J. Environment working paper 21. Environment Department, World Bank; Washington, DC: 1989. The on-site costs of soil erosion in Mali.

MeSH terms