Alpha spectral power and coherence in the patients with mild cognitive impairment during a three-level working memory task

Abstract

Objective: The functional relationship between calculated alpha band spectral power and inter-/intra-hemispheric coherence during a three-level working memory task of patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) was investigated.

Methods: Subjects included 35 MCI patients according to the DSM-IV criteria (mean age: 62.3, SD: 6.5) and 34 healthy controls (mean age: 57.4, SD: 4.0) were selected from the community at large. All subjects performed a simple calculation and recall task with three levels of working memory load while electroencephalograph (EEG) signal was recorded. The spectral EEG power was computed over alpha1 (8.0-10.0 Hz) and alpha2 (10.5-13.0 Hz) frequency bands and was compared between rest stage and working memory processing stage by two-way ANOVA. Post hoc testing analyzed the differences between each two levels of working memory load during task processing. The inter-hemisphere EEG coherence of frontal (F3-F4), central (C3-C4), parietal (P3-P4), temporal (T5-T6) as well as occipital (O1-O2) was compared between MCI patients and normal controls. The EEG signals from F3-C3, F4-C4, C3-P3, C4-P4, P3-O1, P4-O2, T5-C3, T6-C4, T5-P3 and T6-P4 electrode pairs resulted from the intra-hemispheric action for alpha1 and alpha2 frequency bands.

Result: There was significantly higher EEG power from MCI patients than from normal controls both at rest and during working memory processing. Significant differences existed between rest condition and three-level working memory tasks (P<0.001). The inter- and intra-hemispheric coherence during working memory tasks showed a "drop to rise" tendency compared to that at rest condition. There was significantly higher coherence in MCI patients than in the controls. When task difficulties increased, the cortical connectivity of intra-hemispheric diminished while the inter-hemispheric connectivity dominantly maintained the cognitive processing in MCI patients.

Conclusion: The results of the present study indicate that the alpha frequency band may be the characteristic band in distinguishing MCI patients from normal controls during working memory tasks. MCI patients exhibit greater inter-hemispheric connectivity than intra-hemispheric connectivity when memory demands increase. MCI patients mobilize a compensatory mechanism to maintain the processing effectiveness while the processing efficiency is reduced.

Fig. 1

Inter-hemispheric coherence values at rest and during three-level working memory (WM1, WM2, WM3) processing. (a) Inter-hemispheric coherence on alpha1 frequency band; (b) Inter-hemispheric coherence on alpha2 frequency band

Fig. 1

Inter-hemispheric coherence values at rest and during three-level working memory (WM1, WM2, WM3) processing. (a) Inter-hemispheric coherence on alpha1 frequency band; (b) Inter-hemispheric coherence on alpha2 frequency band

Fig. 2

Inter-hemispheric coherence values at rest and during three-level working memory processing in MCI and controls (CON). (a) Inter-hemispheric coherence on alpha1 frequency band during WM1, WM2 and WM3; (b) Inter-hemispheric coherence on alpha2 frequency band during WM1, WM2 and WM3 Compared to controls: ^* P<0.05, ^** P<0.01

Fig. 2

Inter-hemispheric coherence values at rest and during three-level working memory processing in MCI and controls (CON). (a) Inter-hemispheric coherence on alpha1 frequency band during WM1, WM2 and WM3; (b) Inter-hemispheric coherence on alpha2 frequency band during WM1, WM2 and WM3 Compared to controls: ^* P<0.05, ^** P<0.01

Fig. 3

Intra-hemispheric coherence values at rest and during three-level working memory (WM1, WM2, WM3) processing. (a) Intra-hemispheric coherence on alpha1 frequency band; (b) Intra-hemispheric coherence on alpha2 frequency band

Fig. 3

Intra-hemispheric coherence values at rest and during three-level working memory (WM1, WM2, WM3) processing. (a) Intra-hemispheric coherence on alpha1 frequency band; (b) Intra-hemispheric coherence on alpha2 frequency band

Fig. 4

Intra-hemispheric coherence values at rest and during three-level working memory processing in MCI and controls (CON). (a) Intra-hemispheric coherence on alpha1 frequency band during WM1, WM2 and WM3; (b) Intra-hemispheric coherence on alpha2 frequency band during WM1, WM2 and WM3 Compared to controls: ^* P<0.05, ^** P<0.01

Fig. 4

Intra-hemispheric coherence values at rest and during three-level working memory processing in MCI and controls (CON). (a) Intra-hemispheric coherence on alpha1 frequency band during WM1, WM2 and WM3; (b) Intra-hemispheric coherence on alpha2 frequency band during WM1, WM2 and WM3 Compared to controls: ^* P<0.05, ^** P<0.01