Fluoroscopically guided caudal epidural steroid injections in degenerative lumbar spine stenosis
- PMID: 17660853
Fluoroscopically guided caudal epidural steroid injections in degenerative lumbar spine stenosis
Abstract
Background: Caudal epidural steroid injections are commonly utilized to help reduce radicular pain in lumbar spinal stenosis. There have been studies done to evaluate the effectiveness of this procedure non-fluoroscopically guided. Search revealed no prospective studies evaluating the effectiveness of fluoroscopically guided caudal epidural injections on patients with bilateral radicular pain from degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
Objective: To evaluate the therapeutic benefit of fluoroscopically guided caudal epidural steroid injections in the treatment of bilateral radicular pain from symptomatic Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis (DLSS).
Design: This prospective cohort study was performed on 34 patients with bilateral radicular pain from lumbar spinal stenosis who received fluoroscopically guided caudal epidural injections at a multidisciplinary spine center as they did not improve with conservative care. The patients' degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis was confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging and classified as mild, moderate, or severe. The patients were evaluated by an independent observer and completed questionnaires, prior to initial injection, at 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months after the injections.
Outcome measures: Visual analog scale, patient satisfaction scale, standing/walking tolerance scale and Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire.
Results: A total of 34 patients met our inclusion criteria and were followed at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months. Sixty-five percent of patients at 6 weeks, 62% at 6 months, and 54% at 12 months had a successful outcome, reporting at least a >50% reduction between pre-injection and post injection visual analog pain scores. Fifty nine percent of patients had an improved walking tolerance at 6 weeks (p <0.0001), 56% at 6 months (p <0.0001), and 51% at 12 months (p=0.0005). Fifty percent of patients had an improved standing tolerance at 6 weeks (p= 0.0002), 54% at 6 months (p < 0.0001), and 51% at 12 months (p=0.0005). The patient satisfaction scale revealed 64% of patients felt completely or somewhat better at 6 weeks, 59% at 6 months and 52% at 12 months. Owestry low back pain disability questionnaire scores showed statistically significant improvement from initial scores to 6 weeks (p < 0.0001), initial to 6 months (p= 0.0095), and initial to 12 months (p=0.00015). The outcome was statistically significant even in severe stenotic patients when comparing initial mean scores to 12 month mean scores in standing tolerance (p =0.2956), walking tolerance (p=0.0250), and VAS (p= 0.0199).
Conclusion: Fluoroscopically guided caudal epidural steroid injections may help reduce bilateral radicular pain and improve standing and walking tolerance in patients with DLSS.
Similar articles
-
Transforaminal epidural steroid injection via a preganglionic approach for lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar discogenic pain with radiculopathy.Neurol India. 2010 Mar-Apr;58(2):248-52. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.63807. Neurol India. 2010. PMID: 20508344
-
Fluoroscopically guided lumbar transformational epidural steroid injections in degenerative lumbar stenosis: an outcome study.Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 Dec;81(12):898-905. doi: 10.1097/00002060-200212000-00003. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2002. PMID: 12447088
-
Fluoroscopically guided caudal epidural steroid injections for lumbar spinal stenosis: a restrospective evaluation of long term efficacy.Pain Physician. 2004 Apr;7(2):187-93. Pain Physician. 2004. PMID: 16868591
-
Outcome assessment in lumbar spine surgery.Acta Orthop Suppl. 2005 Jun;76(318):5-47. Acta Orthop Suppl. 2005. PMID: 16175972 Review.
-
Randomized trial of epidural injections for spinal stenosis published in the New England Journal of Medicine: further confusion without clarification.Pain Physician. 2014 Jul-Aug;17(4):E475-88. Pain Physician. 2014. PMID: 25054398 Review.
Cited by
-
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Pathophysiology and Treatment Principle: A Narrative Review.Asian Spine J. 2020 Oct;14(5):682-693. doi: 10.31616/asj.2020.0472. Epub 2020 Oct 14. Asian Spine J. 2020. PMID: 33108834 Free PMC article.
-
Fluoroscopically guided caudal epidural steroid injection for management of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: short-term and long-term results.Skeletal Radiol. 2010 Jul;39(7):691-9. doi: 10.1007/s00256-009-0860-1. Epub 2009 Dec 22. Skeletal Radiol. 2010. PMID: 20033148 Clinical Trial.
-
Associations between physical therapy and long-term outcomes for individuals with lumbar spinal stenosis in the SPORT study.Spine J. 2014 Aug 1;14(8):1611-21. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.09.044. Epub 2013 Oct 23. Spine J. 2014. PMID: 24373681 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A double-blind, randomized controlled, prospective trial assessing the effectiveness of oral corticoids in the treatment of symptomatic lumbar canal stenosis.J Negat Results Biomed. 2014 Aug 7;13:13. doi: 10.1186/1477-5751-13-13. J Negat Results Biomed. 2014. PMID: 25099318 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of Intervertebral Level on Interlaminar Epidural Steroid Injection in Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Anesth Essays Res. 2020 Jan-Mar;14(1):100-103. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_136_19. Epub 2020 Feb 24. Anesth Essays Res. 2020. PMID: 32843801 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous