A preventive approach to obstetric care in a rural hospital: association between higher rates of preventive labor induction and lower rates of cesarean delivery
- PMID: 17664497
- PMCID: PMC1934970
- DOI: 10.1370/afm.706
A preventive approach to obstetric care in a rural hospital: association between higher rates of preventive labor induction and lower rates of cesarean delivery
Abstract
Purpose: Annual cesarean delivery rates in North America are increasing. Despite the morbidity associated with cesarean delivery, a safe preventive strategy to reduce the use of this procedure has not been forthcoming. During the 1990s, clinicians in a rural hospital developed a method of care involving prostaglandin-assisted preventive labor induction. An inverse relationship was noted between yearly hospital rates of labor induction and cesarean delivery. The purpose of our study was to compare cesarean delivery rates between practitioners who often used preventive induction and practitioners who did not, while controlling for patient mix and differences in practice style.
Methods: Between 1993 and 1997, different hospital practitioners used risk-guided prostaglandin-assisted preventive labor induction with differing intensity. We used a retrospective cohort design, based on the practitioner providing prenatal care, to compare birth outcomes in women exposed to this alternative method of care with those in women not exposed. Multiple logistic regression analysis controlled for patient characteristics and clustering by practitioner.
Results: The exposed group (n = 794), as compared with the nonexposed group (n = 1,075), had a higher labor induction rate (31.4% vs 20.4%, P <.001), a greater use of prostaglandin E2 (23.3% vs 15.7%, P <.001), and a lower cesarean delivery rate (5.3% vs 11.8%, P <.001). Adjustment for cluster effects, patient characteristics, and the use of epidural analgesia did not eliminate the significant association between exposure to this preventive method of care and a lower cesarean delivery rate. Rates of other adverse birth outcomes were either unchanged or reduced in the exposed group.
Conclusions: A preventive approach to reducing cesarean deliveries may be possible. This study found that practitioners who often used risk-guided, prostaglandin-assisted labor induction had a lower cesarean delivery rate without increases in rates of other adverse birth outcomes. Randomized controlled trials of this method of care are warranted.
Comment in
-
Preventive induction of labor: potential benefits if proved effective.Ann Fam Med. 2007 Jul-Aug;5(4):292-3. doi: 10.1370/afm.730. Ann Fam Med. 2007. PMID: 17664493 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Association not causation: what is the intervention?Ann Fam Med. 2007 Jul-Aug;5(4):294-7. doi: 10.1370/afm.729. Ann Fam Med. 2007. PMID: 17664494 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Taffel SM. Cesarean section in America: dramatic trends, 1970 to 1987. Stat Bull Metrop Insur Co. 1989;70(4):2–11. - PubMed
-
- Hager RM, Daltveit AK, Hofoss D, et al. Complications of cesarean deliveries: rates and risk factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190(2):428–434. - PubMed
-
- Thompson JF, Roberts CL, Currie M, Ellwood DA. Prevalence and persistence of health problems after childbirth: associations with parity and method of birth. Birth. 2002;29(2):83–94. - PubMed
-
- Flamm B, Kabcenell A, Berwick D, Roessner J. Reducing Cesarean Rates While Maintaining Maternal and Infant Outcomes. Boston, Mass: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 1997.
-
- Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service. Healthy People 2000: National Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Objectives: Full Report, With Commentary. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office; 1990. DHHS publication No. (PHS)91-50212.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical