Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2007 Jul-Aug;5(4):320-7.
doi: 10.1370/afm.701.

Translation of an efficacious cancer-screening intervention to women enrolled in a Medicaid managed care organization

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Translation of an efficacious cancer-screening intervention to women enrolled in a Medicaid managed care organization

Allen J Dietrich et al. Ann Fam Med. 2007 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: An earlier randomized controlled trial of prevention care management (PCM) found significant improvement in breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer-screening rates among women attending Community Health Centers but required substantial research support. This study evaluated the impact of a streamlined PCM delivered through a Medicaid managed care organization (MMCO), an infrastructure with the potential to sustain this program for the long term.

Methods: This randomized trial was conducted within an MMCO serving New York City between May 2005 and December 2005. A total of 1,316 women aged 40 to 69 years and not up to date for at least 1 targeted cancer-screening test were randomized to either PCM or a comparison group. Women in the PCM group received up to 3 scripted telephone calls to identify barriers and provide support to obtain any needed breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer-screening tests. Women in the comparison group received a modified version of the MMCO's established mammography telephone outreach program, also in up to 3 calls. Women in both groups received a financial incentive on confirmation that they had received a mammogram. Screening status was assessed through MMCO administrative data. Groups were compared using odds ratios.

Results: In an intent-to-treat comparison adjusted for baseline screening status, PCM women were 1.69 times more likely to be up-to-date for colorectal cancer-screening tests at follow-up than women in the comparison group (95% confidence interval, 1.03-2.77). Follow-up screening rates for cervical and breast cancer did not differ significantly between study groups on an intent-to-treat basis.

Conclusions: The abbreviated PCM telephone intervention was feasible to deliver through an MMCO and improved screening for 1 cancer. This approach has the potential to improve cancer-screening rates significantly in settings that can provide telephone support to women known to be overdue.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00376909.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Relationship of the randomized trial study groups to the established program.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Flow of participants through randomization and treatment. * Dropouts include women who, by the time of their initial call, (1) were no longer insured by Affinity, (2) were no longer receiving care at a participating Community Health Center, or (3) declined telephone support.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jacobellis J, Cutter G. Mammography screening and differences in stage of disease by race/ethnicity. Am J Public Health. 2002;92(7):1144–1150. - PMC - PubMed
    1. O’Malley AS, Forrest CB, Feng S, Mandelblatt J. Disparities despite coverage: gaps in colorectal cancer screening among Medicare beneficiaries. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(18):2129–2135. - PubMed
    1. National Healthcare Disparities Report, 2003. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2003. http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/nhdr03/nhdr03.htm. Accessed 20 October 2006.
    1. Mayberry RM, Coates RJ, Hill HA, et al. Determinants of black/white differences in colon cancer survival. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995;87(22):1686–1693. - PubMed
    1. Smedley BD, Stith AY, Nelson AR, eds. Committee on Understanding and Eliminating Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care, and Board on Health Sciences Policy, Institute of Medicine. Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2003. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data