Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2007 Aug;110(2 Pt 1):330-9.
doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000275284.24298.23.

Group prenatal care and perinatal outcomes: a randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Group prenatal care and perinatal outcomes: a randomized controlled trial

Jeannette R Ickovics et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Aug.

Erratum in

  • Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Oct;110(4):937

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether group prenatal care improves pregnancy outcomes, psychosocial function, and patient satisfaction and to examine potential cost differences.

Methods: A multisite randomized controlled trial was conducted at two university-affiliated hospital prenatal clinics. Pregnant women aged 14-25 years (n=1,047) were randomly assigned to either standard or group care. Women with medical conditions requiring individualized care were excluded from randomization. Group participants received care in a group setting with women having the same expected delivery month. Timing and content of visits followed obstetric guidelines from week 18 through delivery. Each 2-hour prenatal care session included physical assessment, education and skills building, and support through facilitated group discussion. Structured interviews were conducted at study entry, during the third trimester, and postpartum.

Results: Mean age of participants was 20.4 years; 80% were African American. Using intent-to-treat analyses, women assigned to group care were significantly less likely to have preterm births compared with those in standard care: 9.8% compared with 13.8%, with no differences in age, parity, education, or income between study conditions. This is equivalent to a risk reduction of 33% (odds ratio 0.67, 95% confidence interval 0.44-0.99, P=.045), or 40 per 1,000 births. Effects were strengthened for African-American women: 10.0% compared with 15.8% (odds ratio 0.59, 95% confidence interval 0.38-0.92, P=.02). Women in group sessions were less likely to have suboptimal prenatal care (P<.01), had significantly better prenatal knowledge (P<.001), felt more ready for labor and delivery (P<.001), and had greater satisfaction with care (P<.001). Breastfeeding initiation was higher in group care: 66.5% compared with 54.6%, P<.001. There were no differences in birth weight nor in costs associated with prenatal care or delivery.

Conclusion: Group prenatal care resulted in equal or improved perinatal outcomes at no added cost.

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00271960

Level of evidence: I.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
CONSORT study description. All outcomes were measured using medical records or at the trimester 3 interview, with the exception of breastfeeding initiation, which was measured at the interview conducted 6 months postpartum (n=783). There was no differential dropout between group and individual care (P=.95).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Preterm delivery for total sample and African Americans only. All analyses were controlled for factors that were different by study condition (P<.10), despite randomization (race, age, prenatal distress, history of preterm birth) and clinical risk factors strongly associated with birth outcomes (smoking, prior miscarriage or stillbirth). Total sample: odds ratio (OR) 0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44−0.99, P=.045; African American only: OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.38−0.92, P=.02.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Hazard function for preterm birth. χ2=3.79, P=.048.

Comment in

References

    1. Tucker J, McGuire W. Epidemiology of preterm birth. BMJ. 2004;329:675–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hofman PL, Regan F, Jackson WE, Jefferies C, Knight DB, Robinson EM, et al. Premature birth and later insulin resistance. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2179–86. - PubMed
    1. Foulder-Hughes LA, Cooke RW. Motor, cognitive, and behavioural disorders in children born very preterm. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2003;45:97–103. - PubMed
    1. Hobel CJ, Ross MG, Bemis RL, Bragonier JR, Nessim S, Sandhu M, et al. The West Los Angeles Preterm Birth Prevention Project. I. Program impact on high-risk women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170:54–62. - PubMed
    1. Klerman LV, Ramey SL, Goldenberg RL, Marbury S, Hou J, Cliver SP. A randomized trial of augmented prenatal care for multiple-risk, Medicaid-eligible African American women. Am J Pub Health. 2001;91:105–11. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data