Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2007 Nov;46(5):1476-84.
doi: 10.1002/hep.21845.

Outcomes of donor evaluation in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Outcomes of donor evaluation in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation

James F Trotter et al. Hepatology. 2007 Nov.

Abstract

The purpose of donor evaluation for adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is to discover medical conditions that could increase the donor postoperative risk of complications and to determine whether the donor can yield a suitable graft for the recipient. We report the outcomes of LDLT donor candidates evaluated in a large multicenter study of LDLT. The records of all donor candidates and their respective recipients between 1998 and 2003 were reviewed as part of the Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study (A2ALL). The outcomes of the evaluation were recorded along with demographic data on the donors and recipients. Of the 1011 donor candidates evaluated, 405 (40%) were accepted for donation. The donor characteristics associated with acceptance (P < 0.05) were younger age, lower body mass index, and biological or spousal relationship to the recipient. Recipient characteristics associated with donor acceptance were younger age, lower Model for End-stage Liver Disease score, and shorter time from listing to first donor evaluation. Other predictors of donor acceptance included earlier year of evaluation and transplant center.

Conclusion: Both donor and recipient features appear to affect acceptance for LDLT. These findings may aid the donor evaluation process and allow an objective assessment of the likelihood of donor candidate acceptance.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Brandhagen D, Fidler J, Rosen C. Evaluation of the donor liver for living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2003;9(10 Suppl 2):S16–S28. - PubMed
    1. Rudow DL, Brown RS., Jr Evaluation of living liver donors. Prog Transplant. 2003;13:110–116. - PubMed
    1. Trotter JF. Selection of donors for living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2003;9(10 Suppl 2):S2–S7. - PubMed
    1. Olthoff KM, Merion RM, Ghobrial RM, Abecassis MM, Fair JH, Fisher RA, et al. Outcomes of 385 adult-to-adult living donor liver transplant recipients: a report from the A2ALL consortium. Ann Surg. 2005;242:314–325. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Verna EC, Hunt KH, Renz JF, Rudow DL, Hafliger S, Dove LM, et al. Predictors of candidate maturation among potential living donors. Am J Transplant. 2005;5:2549–2554. - PubMed

Publication types