Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2007;79(5):40-6.

[Periarthritis of the shoulder joint: variants of the course and treatment with artrofoon]

[Article in Russian]
  • PMID: 17672074
Clinical Trial

[Periarthritis of the shoulder joint: variants of the course and treatment with artrofoon]

[Article in Russian]
N A Khitrov. Ter Arkh. 2007.

Abstract

Aim: To compare efficacy of shoulder joint periarthritis (SJP) treatment with artrofoon vs non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID).

Material and methods: SJP patients of the study group (12 males, 18 females, mean age 59.4 +/- 8.9 years, the disease duration 6.5 +/- 3.8 years) received artrofoon (1 tablet 8 times a day for 3 months, in improvement of the condition the dose was reduced to 4 tablets a day). Patients of the control group (11 males, 19 females, mean age 58.3 +/- 9.6 years, the disease duration 5.1 +/- 4.1 years) were given NSAID (primarily diclofenac in a dose 100 mg/day with subsequent dose reduction in improvement). All the patients were examined on the day of the treatment start, 2 weeks, 1 and 3 months later. The examination protocol included general examination, measurement of blood pressure, body mass, height, pain at rest and exercise, motility of the shoulder joint, subjective and objective efficacy and tolerance of the drugs. Total blood count, biochemical blood analysis, urine test, ECG, x-ray, ultrasound investigation of the joint were performed before and after therapy.

Results: The majority of the patients from both groups experienced nocturnal pain relief, artrofoon relived also pain at the joint movement. Significant objective and subjective responses were registered in 15 and 14, partial response--in 10 and 12 patients of the study group, respectively, no response--in 5 and 4 patients, respectively. In the controls, the above degree of the response was in 9 and 12, 18 and 16, 3 and 2 patients, respectively. Negative effects of the treatments were not seen.

Conclusion: SJP treatment with artrofoon is effective. It relieves pain, improves motility of the joint, normalizes mental and somatic status of the patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

MeSH terms

Substances