Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Aug;4(8):999-1005.
doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2007.04.019. Epub 2007 Apr 27.

Prognostic significance of circadian variability of RR and QT intervals and QT dynamicity in patients with chronic heart failure

Affiliations

Prognostic significance of circadian variability of RR and QT intervals and QT dynamicity in patients with chronic heart failure

Eiichi Watanabe et al. Heart Rhythm. 2007 Aug.

Abstract

Background: In patients with chronic heart failure (CHF), circadian variability of RR and QT intervals may be altered because of neurohumoral activation and functional and structural remodeling of the heart.

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of circadian variability of the RR and QT intervals and QT dynamicity (QT/RR slope) in CHF patients.

Methods: We prospectively enrolled 121 patients with stable CHF in sinus rhythm (age 67 +/- 14 years, mean +/- SD; range 34 to 87 years). The RR, QT, and rate-corrected QT (QTc) intervals and the QT/RR slope measured from 24-hour Holter electrocardiogram were fitted by cosine curves.

Results: During the follow-up period of 34 +/- 17 months, 40 (33%) patients died of cardiac causes, 10 of which were sudden. All patients showed significant circadian rhythms in the RR, QT, and QTc intervals and the QT/RR slope by cosine-curve fitting. In addition to the expected higher heart rate, longer QT interval, and steeper QT/RR slope, we found that patient who died of cardiac causes had reduced circadian variability of QT interval (10 +/- 10 ms vs 21 +/- 13 ms) and a later maximum RR interval (4.1 +/- 0.9 AM vs 2.3 +/- 2.1 AM) compared with survivors, among many other statistically significant circadian parameter differences. These 2 parameters were independent predictors of cardiac death in multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.

Conclusion: Circadian variability analyses of Holter-derived RR and QT intervals may provide prognostic information beyond that provided by 24-hour averages of these parameters.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources