Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Sep;47(19):2499-505.
doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.06.010. Epub 2007 Aug 6.

Letter case and text legibility in normal and low vision

Affiliations

Letter case and text legibility in normal and low vision

Aries Arditi et al. Vision Res. 2007 Sep.

Abstract

It is thought by cognitive scientists and typographers alike, that lower-case text is more legible than upper-case. Yet lower-case letters are, on average, smaller in height and width than upper-case characters, which suggests an upper-case advantage. Using a single unaltered font and all upper-, all lower-, and mixed-case text, we assessed size thresholds for words and random strings, and reading speeds for text with normal and visually impaired participants. Lower-case thresholds were roughly 0.1 log unit higher than upper. Reading speeds were higher for upper- than for mixed-case text at sizes twice acuity size; at larger sizes, the upper-case advantage disappeared. Results suggest that upper-case is more legible than the other case styles, especially for visually-impaired readers, because smaller letter sizes can be used than with the other case styles, with no diminution of legibility.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Shapes of words in (a), outlined in (b), are more distinctive in mixed-case and lower case than all upper-case text.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Means of normally-sighted participants' (n = 3) log size thresholds (in arc min visual angle) for identification of words and random strings as a function of letter case condition. Error bars indicate +/− 1 s.e.m.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Means of log size threholds of participants with low vision (n = 4) as in Figure 2.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Mean reading speeds for MNREAD sentences presented by RSVP (left) and continuous text (right) for the two case conditions for normally-sighted readers (acuity reserve = 2; n=3).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Average reading speeds for MNREAD sentences presented by RSVP (left) and continuous text (right) for the two case conditions for low vision readers (acuity reserve = 2; n=4).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Average reading speeds for MNREAD sentences presented by RSVP (left) and continuous text (right) for the two case conditions for two normally-sighted readers (acuity reserve = 10; n=2).

References

    1. Arditi A. Lapses in the verbal reporting task. Vision Research. 2006;46(8–9):1327–1330. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carver RP. Word length, prose difficulty, and reading rate. Journal of Reading Behavior. 1976;8:193–203.
    1. Cattell JM. The time taken up by cerebral operations. Mind. 1886;11:277–282. 524–538.
    1. Finney DJ. Probit Analysis. 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1971.
    1. Francis WN, Kucera H. Frequency analysis of English Usage Lexicon and Grammar. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin; 1982.

Publication types