Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Aug:69:85-93.
doi: 10.1080/14034950701355627.

Coping with change: household structure and composition in rural South Africa, 1992 - 2003

Sangeetha Madhavan  1 , Enid J Schatz
Affiliations

Coping with change: household structure and composition in rural South Africa, 1992 - 2003

Sangeetha Madhavan et al. Scand J Public Health Suppl. 2007 Aug.

Abstract

Aim: To describe household change over a 10-year period of tremendous social, political, economic and health transformation in South Africa using data from the Agincourt health and demographic surveillance system in the rural northeast of South Africa.

Methods: Examination of household structure and composition at three points: 1992, 1997, and 2003. These three years loosely represent conditions immediately before the elections (1992), short term post-elections (1997), and longer term (2003), and span a period of notable increase in HIV prevalence.

Results: Average household size decreased and the proportion headed by females increased. The within-household dependency ratios for children and elders both decreased, as did the proportion of households containing foster children. The proportion with at least one maternal orphan doubled, but was still relatively small at 5.5%.

Conclusions: This analysis is a starting point for future investigations aimed at explaining how HIV/AIDS and other sociocultural changes post-apartheid have impacted on household organization. The analysis shows both consistency and change in measures of household structure and composition between 1992 and 2003. The changes do not include an increase in various types of "fragile families", such as child-headed or skipped-generation households that might be expected due to HIV/AIDS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Agincourt population pyramid 1992, 1997 and 2003.
None
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Murray C. Families divided: The impact of migrant labour in Lesotho. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge: 1981.
    1. Ross FC. Diffusing domesticity: Domestic fluidity in Die Bos. Social Dynamics. 1996;22:55–71.
    1. Houghton DH. Men of two worlds: Some aspects of migratory labour in South Africa. South Afr J Econ. 1960;28:177–90.
    1. Posel D. Have migration patterns in post-apartheid South Africa changed? In: Tienda M, Findley S, Tollman S, Preston-Whyte E, editors. Africa on the move: African migration and urbanization in comparative perspective. University of the Witwatersrand Press; Johannesburg: 2006.
    1. Wittenberg M, Collinson M. Restructuring of households in rural South Africa: Reflections on average household size in Agincourt subdistrict 1992–2003. University of Cape Town School of Economics and Agincourt Health and Population Unit, University of the Witwatersrand; 2005. Working Paper.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources