Quantitation in gated perfusion SPECT imaging: the Cedars-Sinai approach
- PMID: 17679052
- DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2007.06.008
Quantitation in gated perfusion SPECT imaging: the Cedars-Sinai approach
Abstract
Cedars-Sinai's approach to the automation of gated perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging is based on the identification of key procedural steps (processing, quantitation, reporting), each of which is then implemented, in completely automated fashion, by use of mathematic algorithms and logical rules combined into expert systems. Our current suite of software applications has been designed to be platform- and operating system-independent, and every algorithm is based on the same 3-dimensional sampling scheme for the myocardium. The widespread acceptance of quantitative software by the nuclear cardiology community (QGS alone is used at over 20,000 locations) has provided the opportunity for extensive validation of quantitative measurements of myocardial perfusion and function, in our opinion, helping to make nuclear cardiology the most accurate and reproducible modality available for the assessment of the human heart.
Similar articles
-
The increasing role of quantification in clinical nuclear cardiology: the Emory approach.J Nucl Cardiol. 2007 Jul;14(4):420-32. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2007.06.009. J Nucl Cardiol. 2007. PMID: 17679051
-
Quantification of nuclear cardiac images: the Yale approach.J Nucl Cardiol. 2007 Jul;14(4):483-91. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2007.06.005. J Nucl Cardiol. 2007. PMID: 17679055 No abstract available.
-
Corridor4DM: the Michigan method for quantitative nuclear cardiology.J Nucl Cardiol. 2007 Jul;14(4):455-65. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2007.06.006. J Nucl Cardiol. 2007. PMID: 17679053
-
Artifacts in Quantitative analysis of myocardial perfusion SPECT, using Cedars-Sinai QPS Software.J Nucl Cardiol. 2017 Apr;24(2):534-542. doi: 10.1007/s12350-016-0726-6. Epub 2016 Nov 10. J Nucl Cardiol. 2017. PMID: 27834038 Review.
-
An overview of contemporary nuclear cardiology.Curr Cardiol Rep. 2004 Jan;6(1):13-9. doi: 10.1007/s11886-004-0060-5. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2004. PMID: 14662093 Review.
Cited by
-
Differences in polar-map patterns using the novel technologies for myocardial perfusion imaging.J Nucl Cardiol. 2017 Oct;24(5):1626-1636. doi: 10.1007/s12350-016-0500-9. Epub 2016 May 27. J Nucl Cardiol. 2017. PMID: 27233252
-
"Same-Patient Processing" for multiple cardiac SPECT studies. 1. Improving LV segmentation accuracy.J Nucl Cardiol. 2016 Dec;23(6):1435-1441. doi: 10.1007/s12350-016-0673-2. Epub 2016 Oct 14. J Nucl Cardiol. 2016. PMID: 27743294 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Gated SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging with Echocardiography for the Measurement of Left Ventricular Volumes and Ejection Fraction in Patients With Severe Heart Failure.Res Cardiovasc Med. 2015 Dec 19;5(1):e29005. doi: 10.5812/cardiovascmed.29005. eCollection 2016 Feb. Res Cardiovasc Med. 2015. PMID: 26889455 Free PMC article.
-
Quantitative measurements of myocardial perfusion and function from SPECT (and PET) studies depend on the method used to perform those measurements.J Nucl Cardiol. 2018 Jun;25(3):925-928. doi: 10.1007/s12350-016-0757-z. Epub 2016 Dec 21. J Nucl Cardiol. 2018. PMID: 28004312 No abstract available.
-
Quantitative Nuclear Cardiology: we are almost there!J Nucl Cardiol. 2012 Jun;19(3):424-37. doi: 10.1007/s12350-012-9551-8. Epub 2012 Mar 31. J Nucl Cardiol. 2012. PMID: 22466989 No abstract available.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
