Application of recent definitions of the metabolic syndrome to survey data from the National Cholesterol Education Program Evaluation Project Utilizing Novel E-Technology (NEPTUNE II)
- PMID: 17679790
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-4564.2006.05902.x
Application of recent definitions of the metabolic syndrome to survey data from the National Cholesterol Education Program Evaluation Project Utilizing Novel E-Technology (NEPTUNE II)
Abstract
This was a post hoc analysis of data collected in the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Evaluation Project Utilizing Novel E-Technology II (NEPTUNE II) survey conducted in 2003. Among 4885 dyslipidemic patients receiving lipid management in the United States, estimates of the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome according to the 2001 NCEP Third Adult Treatment Panel (ATP III), the 2005 American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Scientific Statement, and the 2005 International Diabetes Federation definitions were 55%, 62%, and 63%, respectively. Metabolic syndrome prevalence among patients with coronary heart disease and risk equivalents was 69%, 74%, and 74%, according to these respective definitions. Notably, in the coronary heart disease and risk equivalents category, the prevalence was similar to that of the multiple risk factor category when patients with diabetes mellitus were excluded from the analysis (46% by ATP III). The metabolic syndrome is common in patients receiving lipid-lowering therapy in an office-based setting. Three recent definitions resulted in similar estimates of its prevalence.
Similar articles
-
Dyslipidemia in the metabolic syndrome in children.J Cardiometab Syndr. 2006 Summer;1(4):282-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-4564.2006.05798.x. J Cardiometab Syndr. 2006. PMID: 17679808 Review.
-
Results of the National Cholesterol Education (NCEP) Program Evaluation ProjecT Utilizing Novel E-Technology (NEPTUNE) II survey and implications for treatment under the recent NCEP Writing Group recommendations.Am J Cardiol. 2005 Aug 15;96(4):556-63. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.04.019. Am J Cardiol. 2005. PMID: 16098311
-
A comparison of Canadian and American guidelines for lipid management using data from the National Cholesterol Education Program Evaluation ProjecT Utilizing Novel E-technology (NEPTUNE) II survey.Can J Cardiol. 2006 Mar 15;22(4):315-22. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(06)70916-3. Can J Cardiol. 2006. PMID: 16568156 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in Japanese-Brazilians according to specific definitions for ethnicity.Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2010 Apr;8(2):143-8. doi: 10.1089/met.2009.0028. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2010. PMID: 19900161
-
Definitions of metabolic syndrome: Where are we now?Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2006 Jul;4(3):185-97. doi: 10.2174/157016106777698450. Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2006. PMID: 16842136 Review.
Cited by
-
Estimating the impact of metabolic syndrome on low back pain and the joint effects of metabolic syndrome and depressive symptoms on low back pain: insights from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study.BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 30;24(1):2359. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19851-6. BMC Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39215306 Free PMC article.
-
GDF15(MIC1) H6D Polymorphism Does Not Influence Cardiovascular Disease in a Latin American Population with Rheumatoid Arthritis.J Immunol Res. 2015;2015:270763. doi: 10.1155/2015/270763. Epub 2015 May 18. J Immunol Res. 2015. PMID: 26090487 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical