[Comparison of minimum inhibitory and minimum effective concentration values for the detection of in vitro susceptibilities of Aspergillus species against caspofungin]
- PMID: 17682716
[Comparison of minimum inhibitory and minimum effective concentration values for the detection of in vitro susceptibilities of Aspergillus species against caspofungin]
Abstract
Caspofungin is a promising echinocandin-group antifungal agent used especially in the treatment of resistant invasive aspergillosis. The guidelines for in vitro susceptibility testing of Aspergillus species against caspofungin are not described by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). The minimum inhibitory concentration that showed a prominent reduction of growth (MIC-2) and minimum effective concentration (MEC) endpoints are frequently used for the susceptibility testing of caspofungin as MIC determination criteria. The aim of this study was to evaluate the in vitro activity of caspofungin against Aspergillus species and to compare MIC-2 and MEC endpoints in the determination of MICs. A total of 32 Aspergillus species (18 A. fumigatus, seven A. flavus, five A. niger, and two A. versicolor) isolated from different clinical samples were included to the study. In vitro susceptibilities of the strains against 0.03-16 microg/ml caspofungin concentrations were searched by broth microdilution method as recommended by CLSI M-38A document, with the use of glucose supplemented 2% RPMI 1640 media. The MIC-2 and MEC endpoints were determined both at 24 and 48 hours. The concordance between MIC-2 and MEC endpoints of the strains at 24 and 48 hours incubations was found as 53% and 100%, respectively, with the difference of +/- 1 dilution. MIC-2 and MEC measurements showed the same values at the end of 48 hours, whereas 7% showed differences in +/- 1 dilution. MEC endpoints were also found to be more stable than MIC-2 in both of the incubation periods. In conclusion, MEC value is a more objective and stable endpoint and easier to use than MIC-2 for testing in vitro caspofungin activity against Aspergillus species.
Similar articles
-
Wild-type minimum effective concentration distributions and epidemiologic cutoff values for caspofungin and Aspergillus spp. as determined by Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute broth microdilution methods.Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010 May;67(1):56-60. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2010.01.001. Epub 2010 Mar 5. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010. PMID: 20207095
-
Caspofungin Etest endpoint for Aspergillus isolates shows poor agreement with the reference minimum effective concentration.J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Feb;48(2):479-82. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01677-09. Epub 2009 Dec 9. J Clin Microbiol. 2010. PMID: 20007389 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of broth microdilution testing parameters and agar diffusion Etest procedure for testing susceptibilities of Aspergillus spp. to caspofungin acetate (MK-0991).J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Jan;41(1):403-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.1.403-409.2003. J Clin Microbiol. 2003. PMID: 12517880 Free PMC article.
-
Candida and candidaemia. Susceptibility and epidemiology.Dan Med J. 2013 Nov;60(11):B4698. Dan Med J. 2013. PMID: 24192246 Review.
-
In vitro antifungal activities of anidulafungin and micafungin, licensed agents and the investigational triazole posaconazole as determined by NCCLS methods for 12,052 fungal isolates: review of the literature.Rev Iberoam Micol. 2003 Dec;20(4):121-36. Rev Iberoam Micol. 2003. PMID: 15456349 Review.