[The necessity of cost-effectiveness analysis in osteoporosis]
- PMID: 17682796
[The necessity of cost-effectiveness analysis in osteoporosis]
Abstract
Economic evaluations are increasingly being used by decision-makers to estimate the cost-effectiveness of interventions. Major changes have recently occurred in the treatment of osteoporosis. The development of a valid economic model (Markov) in the field of osteoporosis is discussed, as well as these limitations. Intervention, such hip protectors, calcium and vitamin D, bisphosphonates, hormonal replacement therapy, SERMs, strontium ranélate, analogue of parathyroid hormone are analysed in the light of cost-effectiveness analyses.
Similar articles
-
Cost-effectiveness of strontium ranelate for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis.Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2010 Aug;10(4):359-66. doi: 10.1586/erp.10.53. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2010. PMID: 20715911 Review.
-
[From effective to economical. The value of good osteoporosis therapy].MMW Fortschr Med. 2002 May 23;144(21):30-3. MMW Fortschr Med. 2002. PMID: 12134421 German. No abstract available.
-
Osteoporosis: overview in disease, epidemiology, treatment and health economy.J Med Assoc Thai. 2008 Apr;91(4):581-94. J Med Assoc Thai. 2008. PMID: 18556872 Review. No abstract available.
-
Cost-effectiveness of strontium ranelate versus risedronate in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporotic women aged over 75 years.Bone. 2010 Feb;46(2):440-6. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2009.08.052. Epub 2009 Aug 28. Bone. 2010. PMID: 19716940
-
Potential clinical and economic impact of nonadherence with osteoporosis medications.Calcif Tissue Int. 2010 Mar;86(3):202-10. Calcif Tissue Int. 2010. PMID: 20205345
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Medical