Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2007 Sep;17(5):364-70.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2007.00846.x.

Dental health, received care, and treatment needs in 11- to 13-year-old children with immigrant background in Heidelberg, Germany

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Dental health, received care, and treatment needs in 11- to 13-year-old children with immigrant background in Heidelberg, Germany

Abdul-Razak Bissar et al. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2007 Sep.

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of the survey was to evaluate the caries experience, the provided care, and the unmet treatment need in 11- to 13-year-old schoolchildren with immigration background compared to children without migration experience.

Methods: A cross-sectional study of 502 schoolchildren, 48% of which have immigration background, was conducted. Schools in areas of disadvantaged socio-economic status were chosen for this study. DMFT scores, fissure sealants, and the occurrence of orthodontic treatments were recorded.

Results: The mean DMFT score of the immigrant children was significantly higher than that of the nonmigrants: 1.5 vs. 0.8. The SiC Index was also significantly different in both groups: 3.7 vs. 2.4, respectively. The Unmet Restorative Treatment Need Index was twofold higher in the immigrants compared to the nonmigrants. Only 45.6% of the immigrants had sound permanent teeth compared to 65.5% of the nonmigrants. The average number of sealants per child was 1.9 vs. 2.8, respectively. In addition, only 31.5% of the immigrants were provided with an orthodontic treatment compared to 48.3% of the nonmigrants.

Conclusion: Children with immigration background demonstrated more caries and received less dental care when compared to children without migration experience. The community prevention programmes, addressed similarly to all children, could not close the gap in oral health between immigrant and non-immigrant children.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources